1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(00)71717-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Röntgenkleinwinkeluntersuchung von Apoferritin in Lösung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that if apoferritin has true spherical shape, the solvent inside the shell can account for only a small part of this hydration and that a larger amount of water bound to the surface of the protein must be assumed. This has been suggested by Fishbach and Anderegg [32] and by Bielig et al [33] on the basis of low-angle X-ray scattering data, although these two papers disagree somewhat on the amount of water bound. Alternatively, apoferritin may not be truly spherical, but may have a slightly extended shape not detected by the methods referred to earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is obvious that if apoferritin has true spherical shape, the solvent inside the shell can account for only a small part of this hydration and that a larger amount of water bound to the surface of the protein must be assumed. This has been suggested by Fishbach and Anderegg [32] and by Bielig et al [33] on the basis of low-angle X-ray scattering data, although these two papers disagree somewhat on the amount of water bound. Alternatively, apoferritin may not be truly spherical, but may have a slightly extended shape not detected by the methods referred to earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These solvent molecules trapped inside the shell will of course be part of the hydration contributing to the hydrodynamic properties of the protein. An estimation from the size of the hollow center (about 7.0 nm in diameter, see [32,33]) of the maximal amount of solvent trapped in this way gives a value of 0.23 g/g protein. The amount of hydration calculated from either the frictional ratio or the intrinsic viscosity of apoferritin, assuming a spherical shape of the protein, is about 0.8 g/g protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar effective magnetic moments have been reported by Schoffa (1965), for ferritin, and by Schugar et al (1967) for solutions of the synthetic iron core polymer, and were interpreted by them as showing depressed magnetic moments due to dimer spin pairing. However, as Blaise et al (1965) have shown, such a measurement on a superparamagnetic material is of very little value unless combined with a thorough magnetic field dependence study of the magnetization. Thus, Blaise et al arrived at a moment of 5.08 BM/iron in their comprehensive study of ferritin, to be compared with only 3.85 BM obtained by Schoffa from a plot like that of Figure 4.…”
Section: I88mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nitrate ions are not coordinated directly to the iron, but act only as counterions to the positively F erritin is an iron-carrying protein known to consist of an inner micelle of hydrated ferric oxide-Fhosphate, having a maximum diameter of about 75 A which is surrounded by an outer proteinaceous sheath (apoferritin) having an inner diameter of 75 A and an outer diameter of approx;mately 120 A (Harrison, 1964;Bielig et a/., 1966). Though the apoferritin shell may be filled with varying amounts of the iron hydroxidephosphate, at maximum capacity, the core amounts to about 2000 iron atoms (Fischhach and Anderegg, 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, its structure is that of a hollow sphere with an inner diameter of 74A and an outer diameter of 122A (Bielig, Kratky, Rohns & Haward, 1966;Fischbach & Anderegg, 1965;Stuhrmann, Haas, Ibel, Koch & Crichton, 1976). In fact, its structure is that of a hollow sphere with an inner diameter of 74A and an outer diameter of 122A (Bielig, Kratky, Rohns & Haward, 1966;Fischbach & Anderegg, 1965;Stuhrmann, Haas, Ibel, Koch & Crichton, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%