“…Over the past decade, lead-halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have made tremendous progress with power conversion efficiency (PCE) reaching 26.1%. , Although the matter is complex and must be analyzed from different angles (e.g., toxicity of elements and derivative compounds according to different tests, environmental footprint, life cycle analysis, which depends also on efficiency and performance etc. ), − and despite the excellent properties of Pb-based perovskites and low amounts found in PV cells and electronic products in which they will be integrated, the toxicity of heavy metal Pb may remain a concern for some of its practical applications. ,, Therefore, in recent years, scientists have initiated actions on developing potentially low-toxicity eco-friendly perovskite alternatives to produce the next-generation lead-free PSCs. − Major alternative classes to lead–halide perovskite comprise tin (Sn)-based − and germanium-based perovskites and derivatives, ,, double perovskites, , and bismuth (Bi)-based − and antimony (Sb)-based perovskite derivatives. − In this race to lead-free compounds, Sn-based perovskites have been more prominent with their PCE exceeding 14%. − Historically, these perovskites suffer from severe instability in the air; e.g., MASnI 3 undergoes chemical decomposition within seconds, due to the undesired oxidation of Sn 2+ into Sn 4+ . − Such poor stability together with unfortunate film morphology are the main reasons why fully laser-patterned (P1, P2, P3) working lead-free large-area PV modules had not been reported so far, since the large lasers used for module manufacturing are placed outside the glovebox and the laser scribing process often takes over tens of minutes or even hours …”