2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root Cause Analysis of the Most Frequent Claims in the Building Industry through the SCoP 3 E Ishikawa Diagram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to select claims for the purpose of this study, firstly, there was a need to identify most frequent claims in construction projects. Thus, 80 most frequent claims were represented from previous research effort by the authors (Parchami Jalal et al , 2019). In that study, a list of most frequent claims originated with the contractors against the owners in design-bid-build (DBB) projects were extracted.…”
Section: Research Objective and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to select claims for the purpose of this study, firstly, there was a need to identify most frequent claims in construction projects. Thus, 80 most frequent claims were represented from previous research effort by the authors (Parchami Jalal et al , 2019). In that study, a list of most frequent claims originated with the contractors against the owners in design-bid-build (DBB) projects were extracted.…”
Section: Research Objective and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 10 claims were then sorted and categorized based on their root causes (extracted from Parchami Jalal et al , 2019). Claims originated from delays, contradictions and changes, and hence new codes were assigned to them (see Table 6).…”
Section: Hard Claimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers worked on developing a clear terminology and taxonomy to investigate the emergence of disputes and to identify "pathogenic influences" for dispute causation (e.g., Ilter, 2012;Love et al, 2010). Vari-ous researchers attempted to explore this phenomenon by adopting different methods such as process models (Mitropoulos & Howell, 2001), fuzzy fault trees Cheung & Pang, 2013), analytic hierarchy process (Acharya et al, 2006;Creed & Joon, 2009) subject matter and diagnostic approach (Cheung, 2014), analytic induction (Love et al, 2011), logistic regression (Diekmann & Girard, 1995), structural equation modelling (Molenaar et al, 2000;Naji et al, 2020), root cause analysis (Parchami Jalal et al, 2019;Arif & Saeed, 2021), cognitive mapping and system dynamic simulation modelling (Ackermann et al, 1997) and interpretive structuring modelling (ISM) (Viswanathan et al, 2020). Anatomy model by Cheung and Pang (2013) includes five levels of dispute hierarchy and systematic hierarchy model by Viswanathan et al (2020) is constructed through ISM.…”
Section: Point Of Departure 1causes Of Construction Disputesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arif and Saeed (2021) explores the bottlenecks in the arbitration process. Fishbone diagram by Parchami Jalal et al (2019) shows the root causes of most frequent claims in the Iranian construction industry procured with Design-Bid-Build contracts. However, fishbone diagrams are limited in reflecting the relative importance and interrelationship between multiple factors.…”
Section: Point Of Departure 1causes Of Construction Disputesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, in the construction industry, knowledge is directly connected to the software systems (Solnosky, 2014;Luth, 2011); that way it creates a common knowledge base for the activities of engineers (Jacobi, 2011). Also, integrated knowledge-based BIM systems providing advanced useful functions for building maintenance operations (Parchami Jalal et al, 2019;Taghizade et al, 2019;Davtalab, 2017). The results of a survey of 125 facility managers showed that most of them believe that using BIM technology reduces the time to search for information (Hu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Building Information Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%