2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2015.7140055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ROS-based online robot programming for remote education and training

Abstract: RPN (Robotic Programming Network) is an initiative to bring existing remote robot laboratories to a new dimension, by adding the flexibility and power of writing ROS code in an Internet browser and running it in the remote robot with a single click. The code is executed in the robot server at full speed, i.e. without any communication delay, and the output of the process is returned back. Built upon Robot Web Tools, RPN works out-of-the-box in any ROS-based robot or simulator. This paper presents the core func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, testbeds in this domain contain robots that occupy a significantly larger footprint and are more expensive than the Robotarium robots, which is an inherent obstruction to using large numbers of robots. 2 The main difference between these testbeds and the Robotarium, however, is that the Robotarium explicitly addresses the robot safety aspect of remote accessibility such that provable damage avoidance of the Robotarium's physical assets is guaranteed even with untrustworthy or malicious users. The testbeds mentioned above in principle allow remote access for cases where a user can be trusted to not damage the hardware but do not explicitly address the safety issues involved once users have been approved for use.…”
Section: A Multi-robot Testbedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, testbeds in this domain contain robots that occupy a significantly larger footprint and are more expensive than the Robotarium robots, which is an inherent obstruction to using large numbers of robots. 2 The main difference between these testbeds and the Robotarium, however, is that the Robotarium explicitly addresses the robot safety aspect of remote accessibility such that provable damage avoidance of the Robotarium's physical assets is guaranteed even with untrustworthy or malicious users. The testbeds mentioned above in principle allow remote access for cases where a user can be trusted to not damage the hardware but do not explicitly address the safety issues involved once users have been approved for use.…”
Section: A Multi-robot Testbedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sebuah robot crawler dengan model tiga dimensi telah diaplikasikan menggunakan ROS dan Gazebo, robot ini disimulasi untuk melihat performa model dan simulasi robot crawler rusia menggunakan visualisasi motion ROS/RVIz [21]. Robot pemrograman jaringan telah diaplikasikan menggunakan ROS untuk kebutuhan pelatihan dan pendidikan, robot ini disimulasikan menggunakan ROS dan jaringan [22]. Simulasi robot manipulator telah diaplikasikan menggunakan ROS dan Gazebo untuk mengimplementasikan sebuah kontrol robot pada sebuah sistem waktu yang singkat [23].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…More recently, the kilobot is becoming popular and the Thymio appears to meet all the requirements to become widely adopted in swarm robotics research. As an alternative, standard benchmark tasks could be implemented via remote controlled labs [e.g., see Zeiger et al (2009), Kulich et al (2013), Casini et al (2014), and Casan et al (2015)]. For example, imagine a confined area in which a robotic arm can position obstacles and objects as remotely specified by the experimenter.…”
Section: Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%