2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-0633(00)00173-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rosetta spacecraft influence on the mutual impedance probe frequency response in the long Debye length mode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the plasma frequency is identified as the frequency of peak power in MIP spectra. While this is consistent with MIP models in plasma characterized by small enough Debye lengths (compared to the transmitter‐receiver distance), the plasma frequency is expected to be located below the mutual impedance spectral power peak for larger Debye length (closer to the transmitter‐receiver distance, Geiswiller et al, ; Gilet et al, . The MIP density may therefore be slightly overestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this study, the plasma frequency is identified as the frequency of peak power in MIP spectra. While this is consistent with MIP models in plasma characterized by small enough Debye lengths (compared to the transmitter‐receiver distance), the plasma frequency is expected to be located below the mutual impedance spectral power peak for larger Debye length (closer to the transmitter‐receiver distance, Geiswiller et al, ; Gilet et al, . The MIP density may therefore be slightly overestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The results are shown in Figure : the DSCD method, which uses a sum of point charges, enables to reproduce the signal emitted by a finite‐size source. It is therefore possible to extend the computation of the mutual impedance by taking into account a non punctual probe geometry, and/or the spacecraft itself to allow to measure the interaction with the spacecraft body (Geiswiller et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: MODELING AND TESTING CLUSTER'S ANTENNAS This linear system is closed, and the computation consists of inverting the (N q + N v )-dimensional complex matrix. The only difficulty for the code developer is to optimize the accuracy and the efficiency for a large number of elements which can be as much as several thousand in some instances [Geiswiller et al, 2001].…”
Section: Surface Charge Distribution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%