2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2004.12.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roughness and damage of a GaAs surface after chemically assisted ion beam etching with Cl2/Ar+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher surface roughness value was obtained with increasing pressure, which could be caused by more chemically driven etching. 12 This result contrasts with the following mathematical expression on the evolution of surface roughness ͑͒ during etching of Si, which was reported by Petri et al 3 ϰ 1 It is understood that this expression is valid at low pressures below 3.75 mTorr, while our experiments were conducted above 10 mTorr. This discrepancy can be explained, by the recent work on the evolution of surface roughness during etching of Si.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A higher surface roughness value was obtained with increasing pressure, which could be caused by more chemically driven etching. 12 This result contrasts with the following mathematical expression on the evolution of surface roughness ͑͒ during etching of Si, which was reported by Petri et al 3 ϰ 1 It is understood that this expression is valid at low pressures below 3.75 mTorr, while our experiments were conducted above 10 mTorr. This discrepancy can be explained, by the recent work on the evolution of surface roughness during etching of Si.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…A higher surface roughness value was obtained with increasing pressure, which could be caused by more chemically driven etching. 12 This result contrasts with the following mathematical expression on the evolution of surface roughness ͑͒ during etching of Si, which was reported by Petri et al 3 ϰ 1 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In discharges through pure chlorine, the etch rate is reported to vanish at low temperatures [76][77][78]. Detailed investigations of Rhallabi et al using chemically assisted ion beam etching revealed that the etch rate at low temperatures is dominated by the desorption rate of GaCl 3 (in fact: Ga 2 Cl 6 ) [79].…”
Section: Langmuir Probe Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%