1990
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90167-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Round table on infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/ infectious pustular vulvovaginitis virus infection diagnosis and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pathogenicity can vary from mild to severe and relative importance of each syndrome varies between countries. It has a world-wide distribution, though some European countries have a long history of BHV-1 control [2]. A number of Member States within the European Union (EU) have either successfully eradicated BHV-1 (Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Austria, the Italian province of Bolzano-Bozen, Switzerland) or implemented an EU-approved compulsory programme (Germany, the Italian province of Trento).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogenicity can vary from mild to severe and relative importance of each syndrome varies between countries. It has a world-wide distribution, though some European countries have a long history of BHV-1 control [2]. A number of Member States within the European Union (EU) have either successfully eradicated BHV-1 (Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Austria, the Italian province of Bolzano-Bozen, Switzerland) or implemented an EU-approved compulsory programme (Germany, the Italian province of Trento).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA is commonly used in the detection and control of this disease (Hebert et al, 1985;Ackermann et al, 1990;Beer, 2010). To assist in the diagnosis of this disease in the UK, the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) uses an in-house indirect ELISA (Anderson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for serological differentiation between artificial vaccination and cattle that were naturally infected (Van Oirschot, Kaashoek, Maris-Veldhuis, Weerdmeester, and Rijsewijk, 1997). This is a useful method to detect infected animals and eliminate them from the herd to prevent the possibility of reactivation of latent virus (Ackermann et al, 1990;Kaashoek et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%