2013
DOI: 10.1080/18128602.2012.671383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Route choice sets for very high-resolution data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that model estimates are strongly influenced by choice set size and composition and that biased parameter estimates and choice probabilities are possible consequences of an incorrectly specified choice set (see, e.g., Bekhor et al, 2006;Prato and Bekhor, 2007;Bliemer and Bovy, 2008;Rasmussen et al, 2017). As enumerating all the paths in a highly-detailed network is unrealistic, Halldórsdóttir et al (2014) tested three choice set generation methods suitable to the task of generating relevant alternatives: (i) breadth first search on link elimination (BSF-LE) (Rieser- Schüssler et al, 2012); (ii) a doubly stochastic generation function (DSGF) (Nielsen, 2000;Bovy and Fiorenzo-Catalano, 2007); (iii) a branch & bound algorithm (B&B) (Hoogendoorn-Lanser et al, 2006;Prato and Bekhor, 2006). As detailed by Halldórsdóttir et al (2014), the tests focused on different multiattribute cost functions that considered not only route length or time, but also bicyclespecific factors such as road types, bicycle infrastructure types, and land-use designations.…”
Section: Choice Set Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that model estimates are strongly influenced by choice set size and composition and that biased parameter estimates and choice probabilities are possible consequences of an incorrectly specified choice set (see, e.g., Bekhor et al, 2006;Prato and Bekhor, 2007;Bliemer and Bovy, 2008;Rasmussen et al, 2017). As enumerating all the paths in a highly-detailed network is unrealistic, Halldórsdóttir et al (2014) tested three choice set generation methods suitable to the task of generating relevant alternatives: (i) breadth first search on link elimination (BSF-LE) (Rieser- Schüssler et al, 2012); (ii) a doubly stochastic generation function (DSGF) (Nielsen, 2000;Bovy and Fiorenzo-Catalano, 2007); (iii) a branch & bound algorithm (B&B) (Hoogendoorn-Lanser et al, 2006;Prato and Bekhor, 2006). As detailed by Halldórsdóttir et al (2014), the tests focused on different multiattribute cost functions that considered not only route length or time, but also bicyclespecific factors such as road types, bicycle infrastructure types, and land-use designations.…”
Section: Choice Set Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using detailed spatiotemporal trajectories of probe vehicles, much recently, research effort has been devoted to a better understanding of people's behaviour, their interactions with each other and with the environment. For example, travellers' route choice set formulation (Rieser-Schüssler et al 2012, Ramaekers et al 2013, urban mobility patterns (González et al 2008, Liu et al 2012b) and accessibility patterns , Chen et al 2013d, commercial centre attractiveness (Yue et al 2012) and traffic emission estimation (Chang et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basing the search for new paths to introduce to the choice set on the actual costs allows us to attempt to fulfil condition (11) on unused paths. (Frejinger et al, 2009), and breadth first search with network reduction (Rieser-Schüssler et al, 2013). Some of these alternative approaches may also be attractive to apply for the RSUE(min) and RSUE(max).…”
Section: Column Generation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%