2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28626-1_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine Violence in Java, Indonesia: Neo-Malthusian and Social Justice Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale behind this expectation is that low-scale “routine” violence usually has little or nothing to do with ethnic groupings. In line with this, Tadjoeddin et al (2010: 6) hold that “horizontal inequality is more appropriately located in the context of secessionist and ethnic conflicts”, an argument that resonates with recent findings by case studies (e.g. Sambanis, 2004).…”
Section: Theorizing Horizontal Inequalities and Political Violencesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The rationale behind this expectation is that low-scale “routine” violence usually has little or nothing to do with ethnic groupings. In line with this, Tadjoeddin et al (2010: 6) hold that “horizontal inequality is more appropriately located in the context of secessionist and ethnic conflicts”, an argument that resonates with recent findings by case studies (e.g. Sambanis, 2004).…”
Section: Theorizing Horizontal Inequalities and Political Violencesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The second method employs count data of violent incidents, as in Tadjoeddin and Murshed (2007) and Tadjoeddin et al (2012), who apply the method in the case of low-intensity routine, everyday violence. However, this measure is not appropriate for high-intensity ethno-communal violence characterized by a high number of deaths per incident.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful examination of violence according to its types is important. For example, while horizontal inequality matters for secessionist conflict or civil war (Stewart, 2008), it is vertical inequality that plays a role in routine-everyday violence (Tadjoeddin et al, 2012). For the Indonesian case, see Tadjoeddin et al (2001) and Tadjoeddin (2011) on the secessionist conflict, and Tadjoeddin and Murshed (2007) and Tadjoeddin et al (2012) on the routine violence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meskipun demikian, kekerasan rutin, yang bermanifestasi dalam tawuran, penghakiman massa, dan pengeroyokan juga kerap terjadi. Tadjoeddin et al, (2012) mencatat, kepadatan penduduk serta dominasi usia remaja memainkan peran sentral dalam kekerasan rutin di perkotaan.…”
Section: Pengantarunclassified