2005
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2005.1522131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routing in ad hoc networks: a case for long hops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
101
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The tradeoff between long-distance direct transmission and multi-hop relaying, both in terms of energy efficiency and network capacity, is now well understood in conventional wireless networks [3,4]. This tradeoff in CR systems is, however, much more complex.…”
Section: A Power Control In Cognitive Radio Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tradeoff between long-distance direct transmission and multi-hop relaying, both in terms of energy efficiency and network capacity, is now well understood in conventional wireless networks [3,4]. This tradeoff in CR systems is, however, much more complex.…”
Section: A Power Control In Cognitive Radio Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, cross-layer optimized power control has been widely exploited [4][5][6][7][8] for maintaining the required target-integrity at a low power in realistic propagation environments. A physical-layer-oriented routing protocol supported by sophisticated power control was proposed in [4] for a Line-Of-Sight (LOS) and shadow faded scenario, where the estimated end-to-end BER of a multi-hop path was used as the route selection metric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the Decode-and-Forward (DF) schemes was proposed in [5] for reducing both the energy consumption as well as the delay of the system. As a further design dilemma, the influence of the 'small number of long hops' versus the 'many short hops' philosophy on the energy consumption was studied in [6][7][8]. It was indicated in [6] that the 'small number of long hops' routing scheme was better than the 'many short hops' routing scheme provided that near-capacity coding strategies combined with a relatively short block length were employed, because a substantial SNR loss was exhibited by the 'many short hops' based routing scheme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is shown in [4] that for a block fading channel multihop routing does not offer any energy benefits for α=2. Routing over fewer (but longer) hops carries indeed many advantages [5]; from our point of view, the most interesting are the reduction of energy consumption at the sensing nodes, the achievement of a better energy balancing, the more aggressive exploitation of sleep modi, and the lack of route maintenance overhead. If the sensing nodes only occasionally need to act as relays, they can sleep longer and only consume energy to make their own data available.…”
Section: A Routing Scheme With Energy-balancing Guaranteesmentioning
confidence: 99%