2019
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201902448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ru‐Catalyzed Selective C(sp3)−H Monoborylation of Amides and Esters

Abstract: A ruthenium‐catalyzed method has been developed for the C(sp3)−H monoborylation of various unactivated alkyl and aryl amides and challenging esters, with a low‐cost and bench‐stable boron source, providing boronates with exclusive selectivity, high efficiency, and high turnover number (up to 8900). This novel strategy may offer a versatile and environmentally friendly alternative to current methods for selective C(sp3)−H borylation that employ even more expensive metals, such as iridium and rhodium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of ruthenium catalysts revealed that Ru-(p-cymene)-phosphine ligand complexes showed very low activity and no enantioselectivity in the hydrogenation of substrate 2a (Table S3, entries 2-14). The RuOAc 2 -phosphine complexes showed limited enantioselecivity and also low conversions (Table S3, entries 15, 16), while the RuCl-diphosphine-diamine complexes performed slightly better in terms of enantioselecivity, but with similarly meagre conversions (Table S3, entries [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The dimethylamine adducts of RuCl-phosphine complexes were slightly more active but gave low enantioselectivity (Table S3, entries [25][26][27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The study of ruthenium catalysts revealed that Ru-(p-cymene)-phosphine ligand complexes showed very low activity and no enantioselectivity in the hydrogenation of substrate 2a (Table S3, entries 2-14). The RuOAc 2 -phosphine complexes showed limited enantioselecivity and also low conversions (Table S3, entries 15, 16), while the RuCl-diphosphine-diamine complexes performed slightly better in terms of enantioselecivity, but with similarly meagre conversions (Table S3, entries [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The dimethylamine adducts of RuCl-phosphine complexes were slightly more active but gave low enantioselectivity (Table S3, entries [25][26][27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the existing methods are either racemic, allow limited scope of substrates, or do not enable the synthesis of N -unprotected derivatives. 11,18–33,35…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, the challenge of α‐aminoboronic acid synthesis was tackled by reductive amination of acylboranes (Scheme 1, entries 1 and 2), [10,11] borylation of amides, [12–14] hydroboration of enamides, [15] electrophilic amination of gem ‐diborylalkanes (Scheme 1, entry 3), [16] a cascade copper‐catalyzed aminoboration of alkynes, [17] and also an interesting one‐pot borono‐Strecker reaction [18] . Two complementary rhodium‐catalyzed approaches were disclosed independently by two research groups, successfully hydrogenating α‐boryl enamides (Scheme 1, entry 4) [19,20] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%