1965
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.54.1.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rubredoxin: a new electron transfer protein from Clostridium pasteurianum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
91
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected from the growth conditions for P. furiosus, the rubredoxin from this organism (RdPf) exhibits significant thermostability, as the UV-visible and EPR properties of the protein are unaffected after a 24-h incubation at 95 "C (Blake et al, 1991). In contrast, rubredoxins from mesophilic bacteria are less thermostable; RdCp is rapidly denatured at 80 "C (Lovenberg & Sobel, 1965), whereas RdDg loses 50% of its visible absorption after -2 h at 80°C (Papavassilou & Hatchikian, 1985). Consequently, RdPf provides the opportunity to study factors that influence the extreme thermostability of this protein and hence to examine structural features that may be important to the thermostability of proteins in general.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected from the growth conditions for P. furiosus, the rubredoxin from this organism (RdPf) exhibits significant thermostability, as the UV-visible and EPR properties of the protein are unaffected after a 24-h incubation at 95 "C (Blake et al, 1991). In contrast, rubredoxins from mesophilic bacteria are less thermostable; RdCp is rapidly denatured at 80 "C (Lovenberg & Sobel, 1965), whereas RdDg loses 50% of its visible absorption after -2 h at 80°C (Papavassilou & Hatchikian, 1985). Consequently, RdPf provides the opportunity to study factors that influence the extreme thermostability of this protein and hence to examine structural features that may be important to the thermostability of proteins in general.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In this discussion, the assumption is made that RdPf is more stable than the other rubredoxins of known structure. As mentioned in the introduction, it appears that RdPf is more stable than RdCp (Lovenberg & Sobel, 1965) and RdDg (Papavassilou & Hatchikian, 1985). No studies of the stabilities of either RdDd and RdDv have apparently been reported.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Rubredoxins Of Known Structurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are found primarily in anaerobic bacteria, and are believed to be involved in electron transfer reactions. The redox potential for various rubredoxins range from -57 to 6 mV (Lovenberg & Sobel, 1965: Moura et al, 1979: LeGall et al, 1988: Adams, 1992 rubredoxins is not well understood, and it has been suggested that tuning of the redox potential is modulated by the protein environment. The protein matrix can alter the redox potential through the ligand field produced by the chelating residues and the electrostatic potential surrounding the metal center.…”
Section: Effect Of Metal-binding On Protein Structure and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purified enzyme is oxidized as indicated by a pink color and a UV spectrum consistent with an oxidized rubredoxin Fe-S center (18). The enzyme was reconstituted with Fe II in the presence of dithiothreitol; upon removal of reconstituting agents, the protein solution was colorless, consistent with a reduced rubredoxin Fe-S center.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%