2010
DOI: 10.5414/nepband23157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rückfallraten innerhalb von 6 Monaten nach erfolgreicher EKT: Eine naturalistische prospektive Fremd- und Selbstbeurteilungsanalyse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Patients with bipolar depression were excluded in seven studies, 12,18,20,[29][30][31]34,35 six studies comprised patients with unipolar as well as bipolar depression, 32,33,[36][37][38][39] and one study included patients with bipolar depression only. 19 Ten of the included studies were prospective 12,[18][19][20]29,30,[34][35][36][37][38] and four had a retrospective design in the continuation phase. [31][32][33]39 Three studies had an interventional design, 12,29,30,34 eleven of them were observational.…”
Section: Study Selection and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…33 Patients with bipolar depression were excluded in seven studies, 12,18,20,[29][30][31]34,35 six studies comprised patients with unipolar as well as bipolar depression, 32,33,[36][37][38][39] and one study included patients with bipolar depression only. 19 Ten of the included studies were prospective 12,[18][19][20]29,30,[34][35][36][37][38] and four had a retrospective design in the continuation phase. [31][32][33]39 Three studies had an interventional design, 12,29,30,34 eleven of them were observational.…”
Section: Study Selection and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 In eight studies, continuation treatment in the group using lithium consisted of lithium monotherapy or lithium plus either antidepressant(s), or antipsychotic(s), or mood stabilizer(s), or C-ECT, or a combination. [18][19][20]32,[36][37][38][39] 4.2 | Quality assessment One randomized study 12 was at low risk of bias, whereas 2 randomized studies 29,34 were at unclear risk of bias. Two cohort studies 31,37 received moderate and 9 cohort studies [18][19][20]32,33,35,36,38,39 received high (i.e., low risk of bias) scores on the NOS.…”
Section: Study Selection and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations