Running to the Store? The relationship between neighborhood environments and the risk of obesity

Abstract

We expand the search for modifiable features of neighborhood environments that alter obesity risk in two ways. First, we examine residents' access to neighborhood retail food options in combination with neighborhood features that facilitate physical activity. Second, we evaluate neighborhood features for both low income and non-low income neighborhoods (bottom quartile of median neighborhood income vs. the top three quartiles).Our analyses use data from the Utah Population Database merged with U.S. Census data and Dun & Bradstreet business data for Salt Lake County, Utah. Linear regressions for BMI and logistic regressions for the likelihood of being obese are estimated using various measures of the individual's neighborhood food options and walkability features.As expected, walkability indicators of older neighborhoods and neighborhoods where a higher fraction of the population walks to work is related to a lower BMI/obesity risk, although the strength of the effects varies by neighborhood income. Surprisingly, the walkability indicator of neighborhoods with higher intersection density was linked to higher BMI/obesity risk. The expected inverse relationship between the walkability indicator of population density and BMI/obesity risk is found only in low income neighborhoods.We find a strong association between neighborhood retail food options and BMI/obesity risk with the magnitude of the effects again varying by neighborhood income. For individuals living in nonlow income neighborhoods, having one or more convenience stores, full-service restaurants, or fast food restaurants is associated with reduced BMI/obesity risk, compared to having no neighborhood food outlets. The presence of at least one healthy grocery option in low income neighborhoods is

Relative and absolute availability of fast-food restaurants in relation to the development of diabetes: A population-based cohort study

“…33 However, when excess weight is considered, our results are in line with several Canadian and US reports observing lower weight status among residents of areas with a greater volume of FFR, other restaurants and food retail in general. [11][12][13] Such findings reflect the common coexistence of higher volumes of food retail in areas that Table 2.…”

“…10 Other studies using smaller geographic levels (e.g., the number of FFR within walking distance of residential areas) found no association or results in the opposite direction. [11][12][13] Measures of FFR exposure also vary widely across studies (e.g., absolute numbers or density of outlets, proximity to outlets), and most studies on the topic are cross-sectional, which limits any conclusions about causality. 9 Moreover, there is a dearth of data exploring direct links between the retail food environment and the development of other dietrelated outcomes, like diabetes.…”

Policy Solutions To The ‘Grocery Gap’

“…4,5 Furthermore, a number of studies demonstrate that residents with supermarkets in their neighborhoods are more likely than those lacking supermarkets nearby to eat more fruit and vegetables, 6 to have a healthy body weight, 7,8 and to have a longer life span. 9 Recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 10 and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) 11 support the development of supermarkets in underserved areas to prevent childhood obesity and related health problems and to stimulate economic revitalization.…”

Geographic and socioeconomic distribution of food vendors: a case study of a municipality in the Southern Brazil

“…Healthy food vendors in a neighborhood (farmers' markets and grocery stores that sell fruits and vegetables) can reduce the time spent by low-income families on public or other transportation 15 , and facilitate the adoption of a healthy diet 8 , benefitting the most vulnerable population 15 .…”