2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1977-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runs of homozygosity reveal signatures of positive selection for reproduction traits in breed and non-breed horses

Abstract: BackgroundModern horses represent heterogeneous populations specifically selected for appearance and performance. Genomic regions under high selective pressure show characteristic runs of homozygosity (ROH) which represent a low genetic diversity. This study aims at detecting the number and functional distribution of ROHs in different horse populations using next generation sequencing data.MethodsNext generation sequencing was performed for two Sorraia, one Dülmen Horse, one Arabian, one Saxon-Thuringian Heavy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
109
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
6
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the equine industry, reproductive traits are greatly important due to the high economic impact they have on stud fees and foal crop (Binns et al, ; Metzger et al, ). However, our knowledge about genetic factors and their role in equine reproduction is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the equine industry, reproductive traits are greatly important due to the high economic impact they have on stud fees and foal crop (Binns et al, ; Metzger et al, ). However, our knowledge about genetic factors and their role in equine reproduction is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method for detecting signatures of positive selection based on intra-population analysis is the identification of high-homozygosity regions [6]. Since ROHs are normally abundant in regions under positive selection, their accumulation at specific loci, or islands, has been used to identify genomic regions that reflect directional selection in cattle [19], sheep [20], horse [21] and goat [22]. We therefore checked if such regions of high-homozygosity overlapped with putative selection signatures in the sheep breeds considered in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All those studies were related to human (Kirin et al, 2010;Nothnagel et al, 2010;Pemberton et al, 2012) and livestock populations (Ferencakovic et al, 2011;Bosse et al, 2012;Purfield et al, 2012;Ferenčaković et al, 2013a,b), since those are well known for systematic and informative pedigrees as well as in computer simulations (Howrigan et al, 2011). Currently, F ROH is considered as standard procedure for quantifying autozygosity and its popularity is exponentially increasing to a number of studies in human (Pippucci et al, 2014;Ben Halim et al, 2015), cattle (Mészáros et al, 2015;Zavarez et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015a), pig (Gomez-Raya et al, 2015;Saura et al, 2015;Silió et al, 2015), horse (Metzger et al, 2015), poultry (Orazietti, 2015), dog (Mortlock et al, 2016), and sheep and goat (Al-Mamun et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2016) populations as well as in wild (Iacolina et al, 2016), and captive populations (Nuijten et al 2016). Not only it is a measure of true or realized inbreeding that is sensitive to the selection, the concept of F ROH is easy to interpret and has several features that surpass F PED in estimating negative consequences of inbreeding.…”
Section: Runs Of Homozygosity: a New Dimension In Estimating Autozygomentioning
confidence: 99%