“…All those studies were related to human (Kirin et al, 2010;Nothnagel et al, 2010;Pemberton et al, 2012) and livestock populations (Ferencakovic et al, 2011;Bosse et al, 2012;Purfield et al, 2012;Ferenčaković et al, 2013a,b), since those are well known for systematic and informative pedigrees as well as in computer simulations (Howrigan et al, 2011). Currently, F ROH is considered as standard procedure for quantifying autozygosity and its popularity is exponentially increasing to a number of studies in human (Pippucci et al, 2014;Ben Halim et al, 2015), cattle (Mészáros et al, 2015;Zavarez et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015a), pig (Gomez-Raya et al, 2015;Saura et al, 2015;Silió et al, 2015), horse (Metzger et al, 2015), poultry (Orazietti, 2015), dog (Mortlock et al, 2016), and sheep and goat (Al-Mamun et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2016) populations as well as in wild (Iacolina et al, 2016), and captive populations (Nuijten et al 2016). Not only it is a measure of true or realized inbreeding that is sensitive to the selection, the concept of F ROH is easy to interpret and has several features that surpass F PED in estimating negative consequences of inbreeding.…”