2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-006-0053-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rupture by damage accumulation in rocks

Abstract: Abstract.The deformation of rocks is associated with microcracks nucleation and propagation, i.e. damage. The accumulation of damage and its spatial localization lead to the creation of a macroscale discontinuity, a so-called "fault" in geological terms, and to the failure of the material, i.e., a dramatic decrease of the mechanical properties as strength and modulus. The damage process can be studied both statically by direct observation of thin sections and dynamically by recording acoustic waves emitted by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(101 reference statements)
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the total loss of the temporal self-similarity prior to fragmentation, only a reversible variation of the b-value was detected. A decrease of the b-value that occurred prior to the "catastrophe" is in agreement with numerous laboratory experiments and field observations reported by many authors (Sobolev et al, 1991;Kapiris et al, 2004;Amitrano, 2006). A distinguishing feature of the ASIC dynamics is the reversibility of the b-value variation, while in conventional geophysical objects the decrease of the b-value is usually considered as a precursor of terminal state (Amitrano, 2006, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the total loss of the temporal self-similarity prior to fragmentation, only a reversible variation of the b-value was detected. A decrease of the b-value that occurred prior to the "catastrophe" is in agreement with numerous laboratory experiments and field observations reported by many authors (Sobolev et al, 1991;Kapiris et al, 2004;Amitrano, 2006). A distinguishing feature of the ASIC dynamics is the reversibility of the b-value variation, while in conventional geophysical objects the decrease of the b-value is usually considered as a precursor of terminal state (Amitrano, 2006, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Chmel (chmel@mail.ioffe.ru) mentations (Korsnes et al, 2004;Chmel et al, 2005). As a rule, the scaling properties of damaged solids are regarded as a result of nucleation and gradual, monotonic development of some self-similar structures, such as the ensemble of hypocenters in rocks or ice (Zang et al, 1998;Weiss, 2003;Amitrano, 2006), or fatigue microcracks in metals (Botvina, 2004). However, the suggested one-way self-organizing is ill-consistent with the hierarchic organization of fracturing (Gabrielov, 2000;Botvina, 2004;Tomilin and Kuksenko, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the aftershock catalogue of Hauksson et al (2012), we compare our estimates with the distribution of seismicity around the main fault, which is another indicator of distributed damage in the host rock (Amitrano 2006;Powers & Jordan 2010). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cracks within rock germinate, expand, and ultimately penetrate, the internal accumulation strain energy is released in the form of waves, resulting in microseismic events [1][2][3][4][5]. Microseismic monitoring technology can be employed to collect and analyse microseismic events, the data from which can be used to invert the time, location, and magnitude of microseismic event and predict the possibility, energy, and position of large-scale deformation and failure of soft rock tunnels [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%