2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rupturing implicature in the Mapudungun verbal system: The suffix-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This productivity certainly contrasts with how prevalent the past temporal interpretations are in the Mapudungun literature (although see Golluscio 2000 for a view against the classical interpretation of -fu- as a past tense) 6 . This tendency was explained to me by the fact that the ‘something going wrong’ component expressed by -fu- clauses tends to be known only retrospectively.…”
Section: Frustratives Across Languagesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This productivity certainly contrasts with how prevalent the past temporal interpretations are in the Mapudungun literature (although see Golluscio 2000 for a view against the classical interpretation of -fu- as a past tense) 6 . This tendency was explained to me by the fact that the ‘something going wrong’ component expressed by -fu- clauses tends to be known only retrospectively.…”
Section: Frustratives Across Languagesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As is well documented (Croese 1984, Golluscio 2000, Smeets 2008, Zúñiga 2006), Mapudungun possesses no temporal markers for the present and past; future interpretations, for their part, are conveyed by the verbal suffix -a- (8c). Thus, a clause that lacks -a- can be interpreted either as a present or a past, whereas one marked with -a- can only be interpreted as a future.…”
Section: Frustratives Across Languagesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-2017 temporal de la forma verbal no marcada (es decir, sin morfemas tempo-aspectuales) puede ser pasada o presente, dependiendo de su Aktionsart: en general, las formas básicas dinámicas (y estativas episódicas) hacen referencia al pasado, mientras que las estativas (especialmente las permanentes) hacen referencia a eventos presentes (Soto y Hasler 2015) (5-6). El inventario de morfemas tempo-aspectuales está conformado por un morfema que indicaría tiempo deíctico (-a 'futuro'), varios morfemas aspectuales (-ke 'habitual', -le 'estativo, progresivo', -fu 'antiperfecto', -ka 'continuativo', -we 'persistencia', -meke 'progresivo', -tu 'iterativo-reversivo', entre otros) y un morfema de modalidad epistémica (certeza) asociado a la percepción directa, que suele adquirir el valor de proximidad (-pe 'pasado reciente') (entre otros, Golluscio 2000;Zúñiga 2001;Loncon 2007;Smeets 2008 (Soto y Hasler 2015: 103) La naturaleza mayoritariamente aspectual del inventario, sumada a su carácter relativamente facultativo, incide en que el anclaje deíctico de las cláusulas se realice de manera relevante mediante adverbiales o, simplemente, quede abierto a la inferencia contextual. Por ejemplo, un predicado de logro (kutranün 'enfermarse') estativizado mediante el morfema estativo -le puede adquirir una referencia temporal presente o pasada, siendo relevante la presencia de adverbiales de tiempo para poder fijarla (7).…”
Section: Elementos Lingüísticos Para La Expresión Del Tiempounclassified
“…Entre otras, podemos mencionarZúñiga 2001Zúñiga , 2002Zúñiga y 2006 Aparte de las fuentes mencionadas en esta reseña, en algunas secciones el autor se apoya enGolluscio (2000) ySmeets (1989).…”
unclassified