2013
DOI: 10.5901/jesr.2013.v4n3p213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural and Urban Differential in Student’s Academic Performance among Secondary School Students In Ondo State, Nigeria

Abstract: This study investigated the difference between the academic performance of students from rural environment and students from urban environment. A descriptive research design of survey type was adopted for the study. Also, parents and students should not feel that they must attend metropolitan schools in order to achieve success.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study found no significant difference between the mean academic performance scores of undergraduate Social Studies students taught using e-learning in relation to gender and institutional ownership. This finding reaffirms the results of Chen, Lambert and Guidry (2010), Alokan and Arijesuyo (2013), and Naqvi and Naqvi (2017) which reveal no significant difference in the academic performance of students in relation to gender and the location of their schools. However, the study disconfirms the result of Ngwu (2015), Opoku-Asare and Siaw (2015) and Akinwumi (2017) which find that students in boys-only school have higher mean performances than those in girls-only schools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study found no significant difference between the mean academic performance scores of undergraduate Social Studies students taught using e-learning in relation to gender and institutional ownership. This finding reaffirms the results of Chen, Lambert and Guidry (2010), Alokan and Arijesuyo (2013), and Naqvi and Naqvi (2017) which reveal no significant difference in the academic performance of students in relation to gender and the location of their schools. However, the study disconfirms the result of Ngwu (2015), Opoku-Asare and Siaw (2015) and Akinwumi (2017) which find that students in boys-only school have higher mean performances than those in girls-only schools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, Chen, Lambert and Guidry (2010), Alokan and Arijesuyo (2013) and Naqvi and Naqvi (2017) reveal no significant difference in the academic performance of students in relation to gender and the ownership of schools. On the contrary, the study disconfirms the results of Ngwu (2015), Opoku-Asare and Siaw (2015) and Akinwumi (2017) which indicate that students at boys-only schools have higher mean performances than those at girls-only schools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is further observed from the results that the adolescents in the urban communities were rated high and rural children low, with semi-urban adolescents falling somewhere in-between. The finding corroborates Owoeye and Yara (2011), Alokan and Arijesuyo (2013) and Onoyase (2015) study findings that uncovered differences in academic performance of students in rural and urban settings. The finding is also consistent with Totan et al (2014) revelation of differences in the social competence of the adolescents who resided in different settings.…”
Section: Social Competence Of Children In Rural Seri-urban and Urbansupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, contrary to the above, the finding of the present study in which no significant difference is found in place of residence vis-à-vis mathematics results is explicable owing to government efforts in narrowing the imbalances between urban and rural schools (in terms of resources and facilities) and exposures to television and Internet in the rural environment had assisted students in rural areas to study English so they could keep up with their maths which was taught in the English language. This was supported by the study of Alokan & Arijesuyo (2013). In sum, the outcomes of the present study suggest that the null hypothesis failed to be rejected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%