Rural–Urban Differences in Bonding and Bridging Social Capital

Sørensen, Jens Fyhn Lykke

doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.918945

Cited by 111 publications

(98 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Posredstvom jednog ili više indikatora po dimenziji DK, dio je istraživao sve četiri dimenzije (Onyx i Bullen, 2000;Putnam, 2000;Ziersch i dr., 2009;Nummela i dr., 2009;Xu, Perkins i Chow, 2010;Meng i Chen, 2014;Wun'Gaeo i dr., 2014;Sørensen, 2016), dok su ostali bili fokusirani na njih jednu do tri (Beaudoin i Thorson, 2004;Norstrand i Xu, 2011;Mohnen i dr., 2011;Sørensen, 2012).…”

Section: Operacionalizacija Koncepta Društvenog Kapitalaunclassified

“…Nadalje, iako razlike nisu velike, više međuljudsko povjerenje utvrđeno je kod urbane populacije u odnosu na ruralnu i na uzorku stanovništva srednje i starije životne dobi u jednom predjelu Finske (Nummela i dr., 2009) te na uzorku stanovništva Bolivije (Mendoza-Botelho, 2013). U istraživanjima provedenim u Japanu (Yamamura, 2015) i Danskoj (Sørensen, 2016) u ruralnim sredinama otkriveno je veće povjerenje u ljude unutar lokalne zajednice (partikularno međuljudsko povjerenje), a u urbanim sredinama veće povjerenje u ljude općenito (uopćeno međuljudsko povjerenje).…”

Section: Dimenzija Povjerenjaunclassified

“…Putnam (2000: 221) u SAD-u nalazi kako, u odnosu na stanovništvo najvećih urbanih područja, ruralna populacija ima brojnije članstvo u lokalnim organizacijama. I u Danskoj je u ruralnim sredinama stanovništvo sklonije članstvu u lokalnim udruženjima nego u urbanim (Sørensen, 2016). U urbanim je sredinama veća sklonost članstvu zabilježena u slučaju nelokalnih dobrovoljnih organizacija u Danskoj (Sørensen, 2016) te lokalnih i nelokalnih dobrovoljnih organizacija u Kini (Xu, Perkins i Chow, 2010).…”

Section: Dimenzija Društvene Umreženostiunclassified

“…I u Danskoj je u ruralnim sredinama stanovništvo sklonije članstvu u lokalnim udruženjima nego u urbanim (Sørensen, 2016). U urbanim je sredinama veća sklonost članstvu zabilježena u slučaju nelokalnih dobrovoljnih organizacija u Danskoj (Sørensen, 2016) te lokalnih i nelokalnih dobrovoljnih organizacija u Kini (Xu, Perkins i Chow, 2010). 8 Samo u ranijem istraživanju Danaca (Sørensen, 2012) i stanovništva dviju urbanih i ruralnih sredina SAD-a (Beaudoin i Thorson, 2004) nisu pronađene razlike u članstvu u lokalnim i nelokalnim organizacijama.…”

Section: Dimenzija Društvene Umreženostiunclassified

“…U segmentu rada u dobrovoljnim organizacijama (volontiranje; građan-ska participacija), u ruralnim sredinama su veće razine aktivnosti izmjerene u lokalnim i nelokalnim organizacijama u Danskoj (Sørensen, 2012), u lokalnim organizacijama/akcijama kod stanovništva jedne australske savezne države (Onyx i Bulen, 2000), u istraživanju u SAD-u (Putnam, 2000), u dva-ma tajlandskim predjelima (Wun'Gaeo i dr., 2014) te u Danskoj (Sørensen, 2016). U urbanim je sredinama pak veća sklonost toj aktivnosti zabilježena u lokalnim i nelokalnim dobrovoljnim organizacijama kod Kineza (Meng i Chen, 2014) te u nelokalnim dobrovoljnim organizacijama kod Danaca (Sørensen, 2016).…”

Section: Dimenzija Društvene Participacijeunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Differences in Social Capital Across the Croatian Population Based on the Level of Settlement Urbanisation

Majetić

Rajter

Dević³

2017

revsoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

U ovom radu analizirane su razlike u društvenom kapitalu između sredina različi-tog stupnja urbaniziranosti u Hrvatskoj. Iako je analiza tih razlika u međunarod-nim okvirima istraživački plodna tema, u Hrvatskoj dosad ciljano nije provedena. Slijedeći Putnamov pristup, društveni kapital je konceptualiziran i operacionaliziran kroz tri dimenzije: povjerenje u institucije, neformalnu i formalnu društvenu umreženost te društvenu, tj. političku i građansku, participaciju. Podaci su prikupljeni 2015. godine anketnim istraživanjem. Korišten je etapno stratificiran reprezentativan uzorak punoljetnog stanovništva Hrvatske (N = 1 000). Veće povjerenje u političke i društvene institucije ustanovljeno je među ruralnim nego urbanim stanovništvom. Stanovništvo velikih gradova iskazalo je manje razine neformalne društvene umreženosti (kontakti s rođacima i susjedima) od stanovništva sela i gradova srednje i manje veličine, dok u pogledu formalne društvene umreženosti (članstvo u udrugama) razlike nisu pronađene. Stanovništvo gradova srednje i manje veličine u volonterskom je radu (građanska participacija) bilo aktivnije nego ruralno. Na posljednjim parlamentarnim izborima (politička participacija) glasalo je više stanovnika velikih nego srednjih i manjih gradova, dok je na posljednjim predsjedničkim izborima glasalo više stanovnika velikih gradova nego sela. Nalazi osvjetljuju teme koje tek treba istražiti, poput odrednica društvenog kapitala unutar sredina sličnog stupnja urbaniziranosti te regionalnih razlika u društvenom kapitalu među sredinama visoke, srednje i niske urbaniziranosti. Ključne riječi: društveni kapital, stanovništvo Hrvatske, urbane sredine, ruralne sredine, povjerenje u institucije, društvena umreženost, društvena participacija

show abstract

Section: Operacionalizacija Koncepta Društvenog Kapitalaunclassified

Section: Dimenzija Povjerenjaunclassified

Section: Dimenzija Društvene Umreženostiunclassified

Section: Dimenzija Društvene Participacijeunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Differences in Social Capital Across the Croatian Population Based on the Level of Settlement Urbanisation

Majetić

Rajter

Dević³

2017

revsoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in the Management of Small‐Scale Irrigation in China from a Social Capital Perspective

Luo

Wang

Sun

et al. 2017

Irrigation and Drainage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because of the different patterns of rural clan society and the 'peer' mode of farmers' interactions, rural households make decisions based on learning, imitation, interaction, and trial and error, the realization of which depends on farmers' social capital. The concept of social capital is introduced to analyse farmers' willingness to participate in the management of small-scale irrigation. The study deconstructs social capital pathways of reducing costs and improving productivity in agriculture. Based on field survey data of 285 farmers in Hubei Province, China, an ordered Logit model is used to analyse farmers' willingness to participate in irrigation management. It is shown that social capital and its four dimensions, i.e. social trust, institutional trust, social networks and social norms, all significantly improve farmers' willingness to participate in such management. Other factors also influence willingness to participate. The larger the cultivated area, agricultural income, or proportion of paddy field, the greater the willingness to participate in this management. The educational level of the head of a household significantly reduces farmers' willingness. Hence, it is recommended to improve farmers' willingness to participate in irrigation management by attaching importance to traditional social cohesiveness, promoting moderate scale management, and orienting rural education toward agriculture. RÉSUMÉA cause des différents schémas de la société agricole, de ses clans, de ses échanges basés sur des reconnaissances mutuelles, les agriculteurs prennent leurs décisions basées sur les méthodes d'apprentissage, d'imitation, d'interaction et d'essai-erreur, qui sont réalisées à l'aide du capital social dont ils disposent. Le concept de capital social est introduit pour analyser la volonté des agriculteurs à participer à la gestion de la petite irrigation. Le présent mémoire détaille les cheminements du capital social pour diminuer le prix de revient à la production agricole et élever la productivité de l'agriculture. Les données recueillies auprès de 285 agriculteurs dans la province du Hubei ont été traitées par le modèle Logit ordonné. Selon les résultats obtenus, le capital social et ses quatre composantes, i.e. la confiance de la société, la confiance dans les institutions, la confiance dans les réseaux sociaux, et les normes sociales, donnent une impulsion considérable à leur volonté de participer. Plus grandes sont la superficie cultivée, le revenu des agriculteurs, la proposition de rizières, plus important est la volonté de participer à la gestion d'irrigation, tandis que le niveau d'éducation des agricultures minimise cette volonté. Par conséquent, afin d'élever leur initiative de participation, les mesures telles que la protection des coutumes de la société rurale, la promotion d'unités de gestion de tailles modérées, le développement de programme de formation agricole à destination des populations rurales doivent être prises.

show abstract

'The threat is in all of us': Perceptions of loneliness and divided communities in urban and rural areas during COVID‐19

Beek

Patulny

2021

Journal Community Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Loneliness is becoming recognised as an important social issue with health and well‐being consequences. The recent and ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic has likely impacted loneliness through increased social isolation, though the effects may vary across urban and rural locations, where the dynamics of social capital, community cohesion and community divide are likely to differ. This paper consequently examines the different and compounding impacts of isolating disasters, such as bushfires and pandemics, on social capital and loneliness in urban and rural areas of Australia. This article compares experiences of loneliness in rural/regional and urban areas of Australia moving from the aftermath of the 2019–2020 bushfires into the COVID‐19 pandemic. Semi‐structured interviews provide a complex insight into how loneliness is experienced across different locations. The key findings included a higher sense of social divide exacerbating loneliness in rural communities, higher levels of loneliness among participants who lived alone in either area. It was concluded that loneliness was experienced extensively among those who were single and/or lived alone, regardless of their geographical location.

show abstract

Rural–Urban Differences in Bonding and Bridging Social Capital

Cited by 111 publications

References 36 publications

Differences in Social Capital Across the Croatian Population Based on the Level of Settlement Urbanisation

Differences in Social Capital Across the Croatian Population Based on the Level of Settlement Urbanisation

Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in the Management of Small‐Scale Irrigation in China from a Social Capital Perspective

'The threat is in all of us': Perceptions of loneliness and divided communities in urban and rural areas during COVID‐19

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About