2016
DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2016.1224065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russia’s Pivot to Asia: Myth or Reality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The triple alliance proposal indicated Russia’s “Pivot to Asia,” although for explicit progress in this direction, Russia required a change of the power balance. After all, it was the developed countries that had rejected Russia, prompting it to change its foreign policy line and look for new partners primarily among large Asian countries (Lukin, , p. 578). By the year 1996, Russia had become a participant in the ASEAN dialogue; in 1997, it joined the APEC; and in 2010, it entered the EAS.…”
Section: The Role Of Greater East Asia For Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The triple alliance proposal indicated Russia’s “Pivot to Asia,” although for explicit progress in this direction, Russia required a change of the power balance. After all, it was the developed countries that had rejected Russia, prompting it to change its foreign policy line and look for new partners primarily among large Asian countries (Lukin, , p. 578). By the year 1996, Russia had become a participant in the ASEAN dialogue; in 1997, it joined the APEC; and in 2010, it entered the EAS.…”
Section: The Role Of Greater East Asia For Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first task for both countries is exploring the Pivot to Asia of Russia and New Northern Policy of Korea. Russia's Pivot to Asia focuses on the development of the Far East and Siberia, while strengthening cooperation with countries in Asia-Pacific region, aims to open the "Euro-Pacific" era [7]. If Russia manages to successfully implement the program of development of the Far East, and Russia will strengthen its position in the Asia-Pacific.…”
Section: Measures For Upgrading Economic Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russian railways must be modified from serving military geopolitical objectives to geoeconomic ends. The Baikal‐Amur Railway was largely a geopolitical construction that sought to avoid close proximity to the Chinese borders, rather than serving the geoeconomic function of connecting with Chinese markets (Lukin, , p. 574). In August 2016, a $6.5 billion railway development plan was announced to improve connectivity between Northeast Asia and Europe by shortening the Trans‐Siberian Railway by 550 km (Khabarovsk, ).…”
Section: Transportation Corridorsmentioning
confidence: 99%