2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2dt12446g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium cryptates with an unusual selectivity for nitrate

Abstract: The synthesis of two new tripodal complexes [Ru(L3)](PF(6))(2) and [Ru(L4)](PF(6))(2), encapsulating a ruthenium(II) cation, has been successfully achieved and the products fully characterized, including by X-ray structural determination. The smaller cavity, built around a tris(2-aminoethyl)amido scaffold demonstrated only moderate and predictable interactions with a range of anions and no significant spectroscopic change with nitrate, chloride and bromide, although dihydrogen phosphate did result in an almost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methylene protons in the complex are diastereotopic and appear as an AB set presenting as doublets at δ = 5.24 and 5.43 ppm with the typical geminal coupling of 14.5 Hz, which is good evidence of the proposed structure in solution. These are significantly downfield of the corresponding protons in the free ligand, and also downfield of the methylene protons in the previously reported[21b] fac ‐alcohol complex [Ru(bipy‐CH 2 OH) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 ( δ =4.60 ppm), probably due to an increased deshielding effect from the adjacent aromatic ring. There are small but significant differences between these two compounds in the bipyridine proton signals, most notably with the H 3 proton.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The methylene protons in the complex are diastereotopic and appear as an AB set presenting as doublets at δ = 5.24 and 5.43 ppm with the typical geminal coupling of 14.5 Hz, which is good evidence of the proposed structure in solution. These are significantly downfield of the corresponding protons in the free ligand, and also downfield of the methylene protons in the previously reported[21b] fac ‐alcohol complex [Ru(bipy‐CH 2 OH) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 ( δ =4.60 ppm), probably due to an increased deshielding effect from the adjacent aromatic ring. There are small but significant differences between these two compounds in the bipyridine proton signals, most notably with the H 3 proton.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…For example, a tris(bipyridine‐imidazolium) ligand reported by Sato, gave a 91 % yield with Fe 2+ , but only 46 % with Ru 2+ , whilst a more recent example Nabeshima and co‐workers show similar differences,[1l] and the systems reported by Oyler et al, and Weizman et al only achieved yields in the region of 25 % despite using high reaction temperatures. In our experience, yields are often observed to be disappointingly low, especially with the more rigid of systems, but high dilution conditions can overcome this to a certain extent, with a yield of 85 % being achieved in one exceptional case . The tether itself can also play a crucial role in the determination of the metal centered stereochemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…15). 39 The tripodal ligand consists of an anion binding amide functionality and metal chelating bipyridyl groups, and its Ru(II) complex is investigated for anion binding studies. Structural analysis of the [Ru28] 2+ complex shows the presence of a cavity in the amide cleft suitable for an anionic species.…”
Section: Metal-based Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%