2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium(II) chalconate complexes: Synthesis, characterization, catalytic, and biological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been further confirmed by the disappearance of the broad O-H band around 3372-3470 cm -1 in all the complexes due to the binding of phenolic -OH group to ruthenium after deprotonation [39]. The strong absorption band around 1932-1948 cm -1 was due to the terminally coordinated carbonyl group.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Studiessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This has been further confirmed by the disappearance of the broad O-H band around 3372-3470 cm -1 in all the complexes due to the binding of phenolic -OH group to ruthenium after deprotonation [39]. The strong absorption band around 1932-1948 cm -1 was due to the terminally coordinated carbonyl group.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Studiessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A strong band obtained around 1320–1300 cm −1 in the spectra of free ligands was assigned to phenolic CO stretching which had been shifted to a higher frequency (1390–1360 cm −1 ) in the complexes, showing that the other coordination is through the phenolic oxygen atom . This has been further confirmed by the disappearance of the broad ν OH band around 3388–3370 cm −1 in all complexes due to binding of the phenolic OH group with ruthenium metal via deprotonation . The medium‐intensity band at 870 cm −1 and a shoulder at 3210–3260 cm −1 was due to the presence of CS and NH groups in the ligands, which disappeared in the complexes, and a new band appeared for CS around 750–760 cm −1 due to enolization of the ligand, followed by deprotonation prior to the coordination of the thiolate sulfur .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[69] This has been further confirmed by the disappearance of the broad ν OH band around 3388-3370 cm À1 in all complexes due to binding of the phenolic -OH group with ruthenium metal via deprotonation. [70] The medium-intensity band at 870 cm À1 and a shoulder at 3210-3260 cm À1 was due to the presence of C¼S and NH groups in the ligands, which disappeared in the complexes, and a new band appeared for C-S around 750-760 cm À1 due to enolization of the ligand, followed by deprotonation prior to the coordination of the thiolate sulfur. [71] The strong absorption band around 1981-1938 cm À1 was due to the CO stretching of the terminally coordinated carbonyl group.…”
Section: Infrared Spectroscopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Octahedral geometries were tentatively proposed for all complexes. 95,96 The antifungal activities of the Ru(II) chalconato complexes against A. niger and Mucor Sp. strains were greater than the parent ligands alone, but still did not reach the efficacy of the standard drug, Bavistin®.…”
Section: Polypyridine Based Metal Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%