2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S-Nitrosothiol measurements in biological systems

Abstract: S-Nitrosothiol (SNO) cysteine modifications are regulated signaling reactions that dramatically affect, and are affected by, protein conformation. The lability of the S-NO bond can make SNOmodified proteins cumbersome to measure accurately. Here, we review methodologies for detecting SNO modifications in biology. There are three caveats. 1) Many assays for biological SNOs are used near the limit of detection: standard curves must be in the biologically relevant concentration range.2) The assays that are most r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curiously, a recent report described activation of MMP-9 by selected concentrations of SPER-NO, which appears to counter our observations, although the mechanism of activation was not addressed (28). First, only high concentrations of an exceptionally reactive S-nitrosothiol, CSNO (29), were found to weakly activate proMMP9, consistent with earlier findings (4), but the biological significance of this is questionable because biological concentrations of SNO are in the nanomolar range (30). Second, although several diverse NO donors and S-nitro-sothiols are similarly capable of inducing S-nitrosylation within a peptide that represents the Cys-containing prodomain region of proMMP-9, the fact that most of these agents cannot activate proMMP-9 would suggest that S-nitrosylation may not be responsible for MMP-9 activation by CSNO or by other RNS (4,9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Curiously, a recent report described activation of MMP-9 by selected concentrations of SPER-NO, which appears to counter our observations, although the mechanism of activation was not addressed (28). First, only high concentrations of an exceptionally reactive S-nitrosothiol, CSNO (29), were found to weakly activate proMMP9, consistent with earlier findings (4), but the biological significance of this is questionable because biological concentrations of SNO are in the nanomolar range (30). Second, although several diverse NO donors and S-nitro-sothiols are similarly capable of inducing S-nitrosylation within a peptide that represents the Cys-containing prodomain region of proMMP-9, the fact that most of these agents cannot activate proMMP-9 would suggest that S-nitrosylation may not be responsible for MMP-9 activation by CSNO or by other RNS (4,9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…At present, most techniques to measure blood RSNOs require the preparation of plasma by centrifugation and subsequent treatment of the plasma samples with various reagents to liberate NO (6 ). During these processes, exposure to ambient light is difficult to completely eliminate, and most methods reported to date do not take any precautions in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To distinguish RSNO from RNNO, mercuric chloride can be used to cleave RSNO to form nitrite, but leaving RNNO intact, which is known as the Saville reaction (12). Sensitivity of the original colorimetric method for the Griess assay was ϳ0.5 M for S-nitrosothiols, which is not low enough for detecting biological levels (33). However, combining the Griess assay with HPLC, flow injection analysis, and microgas analysis system, the detection range has been improved significantly and now these analyses are routinely applied to measuring biological sample.…”
Section: No and H 2 S Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%