2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAAFEC-SEQ: A Sequence-Based Method for Predicting the Effect of Single Point Mutations on Protein Thermodynamic Stability

Abstract: Modeling the effect of mutations on protein thermodynamics stability is useful for protein engineering and understanding molecular mechanisms of disease-causing variants. Here, we report a new development of the SAAFEC method, the SAAFEC-SEQ, which is a gradient boosting decision tree machine learning method to predict the change of the folding free energy caused by amino acid substitutions. The method does not require the 3D structure of the corresponding protein, but only its sequence and, thus, can be appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, few available methods can predict the effect of the variants on the protein stability starting from sequence only. We therefore compared ACDC-NN-Seq on three datasets with the following sequence-based methods: DDGun [14], INPS [13], I-Mutant2.0 [16], MUpro [17] and the recent SAAFEC-SEQ [15].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Sequence-based Machine-learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, few available methods can predict the effect of the variants on the protein stability starting from sequence only. We therefore compared ACDC-NN-Seq on three datasets with the following sequence-based methods: DDGun [14], INPS [13], I-Mutant2.0 [16], MUpro [17] and the recent SAAFEC-SEQ [15].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Sequence-based Machine-learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since experimental measurement of ∆∆G is a time-consuming and complex task, during the last decades several computational tools have been developed to predict ∆∆G values. Some methods are structure-based, requiring the knowledge of the protein tertiary structure [7][8][9][10][11][12], others are sequence-based, either relying only on protein sequences [13][14][15] or optionally taking advantage of the protein structure when available [16,17]. However, most of these methods violate the antisymmetry property and suffer from high biases in predicting reverse variations [10,[18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracellular domain of OPRM1 was used to calculate the folding free energy changes due to mutations A6V and N40D. They were calculated by the SAAFEC-SEQ algorithm [ 66 ], along with third party webservers such as mCSM Protein Stability Change Upon Mutation web version [ 67 ], SDM(V2) [ 68 ], DUET [ 57 ], CUPSAT [ 58 ], and I-Mutant 3.0 [ 69 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutral or benign effects were not considered in the study (Table 1). [36]. Default settings (Temperature: 25 0 C, pH: 7.0) and the "DDG Value and Binary Classification" option were preferred in I-Mutant.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Evaluation Of The Missense Snps Of Ifitm1 Ifitm2 And Ifitm3mentioning
confidence: 99%