2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
260
1
30

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 393 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
260
1
30
Order By: Relevance
“…For performing the selection, summarisation, calculation and interpretation of indicators at farm level, a number of methods have been suggested: RISE [20]; SAFE [21]; MOTIFS [22]; SOSTARE [23], as well as a method suggested by M.N. Thieverges [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For performing the selection, summarisation, calculation and interpretation of indicators at farm level, a number of methods have been suggested: RISE [20]; SAFE [21]; MOTIFS [22]; SOSTARE [23], as well as a method suggested by M.N. Thieverges [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…developed by S. Bell and S. Morse [25] as well as a research study on sustainability assessment by employing FADN indicators conducted in the EU Member States [16] were used when assessing the appropriateness of every indicator. [21] Using the system of levels for assessment of indicators, change in the values of the agroecosystem services and goods created by all the types of capital is assumed to be the starting point. Certain criteria, from which indicators are derived and which influence a function, are set for any change in capital of each type at the next level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by Binder et al (2010) and Marie (2011), the sustainability assessment of agricultural systems was still in the development stage and had shortcomings. The most commonly-used data source for the evaluation of the farms economic, social and environment sustainability is the farmers' survey, Framework for assessing the farm relative sustainability: a Lithuanian case study Vlada VITUNSKIENE,Vida DABKIENE doi: 10.17221/125/2015-AGRICECON employing a structured questionnaire or/and an indepth interview (Sauvenier et al 2005;Urutyan and Thalman 2011;Jalilian 2012). Therefore, recently the available databases as information sources such as the EU Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) have been employed ; Van der Meulen et al 2013;Barnes and Thomson 2014;Ryan et al 2014;.…”
Section: Doi: 1017221/125/2015-agriceconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farm sustainability assessments were conducted in some countries, such as the Belgium (Sauvenier et al 2005), Spain (Gomez-Limon and Sanchez-Fernandez 2010), Iran (Jalilian 2012), the Netherlands ( Van der Meulen et al 2013), Armenia (Urutyan and Thalman 2011), Greece (Dantsis et al 2010), the Veneto region in Italy , Scotland (Barnes and Thompson 2014) and Ireland (Ryan et al 2014). In Lithuania, the farm sustainability has so far been analysed from the perspective of organic farming only (Čiegis 2009;Skulskis 2010).…”
Section: Doi: 1017221/125/2015-agriceconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider sustainability as a broader concept encompassing three interdependent dimensions -that is, economic, ecological and social dimensions (Mebratu, 1998). This approach has also been adopted to evaluate agricultural sustainability by, for example, Van Calker et al (2006) and Van Cauwenbergh et al (2007). We thus consider Fair Trade as part of the concept of sustainability (see also Strong, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%