2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe implementation of minimally invasive pancreas resection: a systematic review

Abstract: Background: Minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) has been expanding in the past decade.Excellent outcomes have been reported, however, safety concerns exist. The aim of this study was to define prerequisites for performing MIPR with the objective to guide safe implementation of MIPR into clinical practice. Methods: This systematic review was conducted as part of the 2019 Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nach durchgeführter Punktion sind die Bestimmung von Muzin und des karzinoembryonalen Antigens (CEA) sowie eine zytologische Untersuchung sinnvoll [64 -66] Der Standardzugangsweg stellt auch in der Pankreaschirurgie zystischer Tumoren weiterhin die offene Chirurgie dar, wenngleich vor allem bei Pankreaslinksresektionen ein laparoskopisches Vorgehen sicher möglich ist und zunehmend eingesetzt wird. Zukünftig könnten minimalinvasive Operationsmethoden durch den Einsatz der robotischen Chirurgie auch im Bereich der Pankreaskopfchirurgie einen zunehmenden Stellenwert einnehmen [68,69].…”
Section: Unklare Zystische Pankreastumorenunclassified
“…Nach durchgeführter Punktion sind die Bestimmung von Muzin und des karzinoembryonalen Antigens (CEA) sowie eine zytologische Untersuchung sinnvoll [64 -66] Der Standardzugangsweg stellt auch in der Pankreaschirurgie zystischer Tumoren weiterhin die offene Chirurgie dar, wenngleich vor allem bei Pankreaslinksresektionen ein laparoskopisches Vorgehen sicher möglich ist und zunehmend eingesetzt wird. Zukünftig könnten minimalinvasive Operationsmethoden durch den Einsatz der robotischen Chirurgie auch im Bereich der Pankreaskopfchirurgie einen zunehmenden Stellenwert einnehmen [68,69].…”
Section: Unklare Zystische Pankreastumorenunclassified
“…A major obstacle to the widespread adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS)especially MIPD-is its steep learning curve. 46 In the literature, several authors have addressed the learning curve of LDP. Depending on the outcome measure, it was reported to be as low as from 10-15 procedures 47,48 for open conversion and up to 40 procedures for reduction in operating time.…”
Section: Learning Curve In Lps and Rpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various factors can affect this "magic number", including the statistical method used (such as CUSUM), outcome measure (such as blood loss, operating time, morbidity and conversion rate), single surgeon vs institutional data, study cohort size and the surgeon's proficiency and experience in MIS and open surgery. 46 Consequently, it is almost impossible to determine the exact number of procedures that are required to complete the learning curve in order to achieve proficiency. It is also very unlikely that the personal learning curves of surgeons will be uniform across indivduals.…”
Section: Learning Curve In Lps and Rpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a small series of patients with refractory CP and dilated main duct, Balduzzi et al [15] described a robotic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy as a feasible but complex operation which is limited to very few patients. Current data are not sufficient to estimate the role of minimal invasive surgery in CP [15][16][17][18]. It should be noted, however, that surgery in CP is challenging due to the chronically inflamed surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Surgical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%