2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.i010706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe2Ditch: Emergency Landing for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the UAV arrives at the landing spot way-point in the x-y plane, we consider that it enters into a different operating mode, and a different planning strategy is required to implement safe landing. This may involve other sensors, such as visual sensors (Lusk et al, 2019).…”
Section: Trajectory Re-planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the UAV arrives at the landing spot way-point in the x-y plane, we consider that it enters into a different operating mode, and a different planning strategy is required to implement safe landing. This may involve other sensors, such as visual sensors (Lusk et al, 2019).…”
Section: Trajectory Re-planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝛼 𝜎𝑇 𝑆 = 𝑃 + 𝑃 (13) when thermal equilibrium is attained, no current passes through the coil, Pd = 0, and Eq. ( 13) results in the following equation;…”
Section: Comparison Of Air-coil Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICAROUS [2] augments Safeguard's geofencing by adding detect and avoid capabilities against fixed obstacles and other vehicles, as well as the ability to compute a conflict-free "return to mission" path. ICAROUS is being integrated with Safe2Ditch [5], a computer vision-based landing site selection system, which should reduce risk to the UAV. However, in the event of a geofence violation, Safeguard still takes drastic action.…”
Section: Threat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICAROUS [2] improves mission assurance somewhat, but its ultimate recourse at present is still Safeguard. When Safe2Ditch [5] is incorporated the vehicle will be safer, but ICAROUS cannot take over the mission if other onboard processors become erratic or unresponsive. The iterative set of solutions below strive to do that.…”
Section: Proposal Mission Assurance For Autonomous Undersea Vehicles (Ma-auv) Proposes To Extend What the Above Related Work Have Done Inmentioning
confidence: 99%