2017
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy Outcomes 3 Years After Switching to Belatacept From a Calcineurin Inhibitor in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a Phase 2 Randomized Trial

Abstract: Switching patients from a CNI to belatacept may represent a safe approach to immunosuppression and is being further explored in an ongoing phase 3b trial.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

13
77
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
13
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed 2 cases of rejection, of which one recovered completely after treatment, allowing belatacept continuation. As in previous studies, the acute rejection occurred soon after initiating belatacept . The rate of AR in the phase II study was 7.1% after 1 year (all cases resolved with treatment) and less than 10% after 3 years .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed 2 cases of rejection, of which one recovered completely after treatment, allowing belatacept continuation. As in previous studies, the acute rejection occurred soon after initiating belatacept . The rate of AR in the phase II study was 7.1% after 1 year (all cases resolved with treatment) and less than 10% after 3 years .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In the phase II study published in 2011 by Rostaing et al, CNI switch to belatacept was also associated with eGFR improvement . This improvement was also found at 3 years, as was recently reported by Grinyo et al . Nevertheless, the switch was performed in patients with stable renal function and not as a rescue therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Because belatacept had not been previously studied in adolescents, initial dose selection for this age group was based on simulations that extrapolated data from an adult population pharmacokinetic model to adolescents . The dose selected for use in adolescents was that necessary to achieve steady‐state trough ( C min ) concentrations comparable to those observed in stable adult renal transplant recipients participating in a phase II study . Based on the assumption that belatacept exposure at C min is highly correlated with receptor occupancy, which then drives pharmacologic activity, and because it was expected that belatacept clearance would increase with decreasing age (due to generally higher metabolic rates in children), we reasoned that a higher belatacept dose was likely needed for adolescents to achieve C min similar to that observed in adults.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no difference in patient or graft survival between groups. A trend in improvement of renal function may have been blunted by the addition of 16 patients who were switched from a CNI-based immunosuppression regimen to belatacept after 24 months post-randomization (32). …”
Section: Aims and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%