2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00087-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunisation with an orally administered aerosolised Ad5-nCoV after two-dose priming with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, open-label, single-centre trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
101
2
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
101
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously reported the incidence of adverse reactions within 14 days post-boost, serious adverse events during the first 28 days post-boost vaccination, the serum NAbs against live SARS-CoV-2 virus and delta variants, receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific binding IgG and IgA responses at days 14 and 28 after the booster dose, and SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific cytokine T cells responses after receiving a boost vaccination [11]. In this report, we revealed the neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and omicron variant and RBD-specific IgG antibodies in serum of the first 40 participants in each of the three treatment groups at months 3 and 6 after the booster dose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have previously reported the incidence of adverse reactions within 14 days post-boost, serious adverse events during the first 28 days post-boost vaccination, the serum NAbs against live SARS-CoV-2 virus and delta variants, receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific binding IgG and IgA responses at days 14 and 28 after the booster dose, and SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific cytokine T cells responses after receiving a boost vaccination [11]. In this report, we revealed the neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and omicron variant and RBD-specific IgG antibodies in serum of the first 40 participants in each of the three treatment groups at months 3 and 6 after the booster dose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the WHO International Standard (NIBSC code 20/136) as the reference for the cytopathic effect-based microneutralisation assays. We used the commercial Anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG ELISA kit (Vazyme Medical Technology, Nanjing, China) to measure RBD-specific IgG responses (RU/ml) with a cutoff titer of 1:10 [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, heterologous vaccination was used in the abovementioned infection/vaccination-booster stratagem, providing corroborative evidence to the effectiveness of the heterologous sequential vaccination strategy against mutant VOCs of SARS-CoV-2. Compared to homologous vaccination, multiple kinds of heterologous sequential immunization were proved to be superior to induce broad neutralization against VOCs, including combination of inactivated vaccine followed by heterologous mutant RBD vaccine ( Song et al., 2022 ), adenoviral vectored vaccine followed by mRNA vaccine ( Pozzetto et al., 2021 ), inactivated vaccine followed by mRNA vaccine ( Zuo et al., 2022 ), and inactivated vaccine followed by adenoviral vectored vaccine ( Li et al., 2022 ). Given the barely affected memory CD4 + T cell responses to peptide pool of Omicron S protein ( Naranbhai et al., 2022 ), it is thus clear that virus-specific memory T FH cells play an important role in the generation of potent and broad neutralizing antibodies to VOCs induced by the heterologous sequential vaccination strategy.…”
Section: Virus-specific T Fh Cells In Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%