2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2020.100070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and immunogenicity of the Rift Valley fever arMP-12 ΔNSm21/384 candidate vaccine in pregnant ewes

Abstract: Highlights Rift Valley fever virus causes abortion, teratogenicity and mortality in domestic ruminants. Safety and immunogenicity RVFV arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 vaccine was determined in pregnant ewes. Vaccine was safe and immunogenic last stages of pregnancy, but may caused malformed lambs early stage. Pregnant sheep should not be vaccinated with the RVFV vaccine during the first month of gestation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of arMP12-∆NSm21/384 were found to be equivalent to those of the original MP-12 vaccine in pregnant ewes, lambs, and calves 98 100 . arMP12-∆NSm21/384 (1 × 10 5 TCID 50 ) did not cause any fetal malformation in ewes vaccinated at 43 to 150 gestation days, while three out of 17 (18%) ewes vaccinated at 7 to 34 gestation days had fetal malformations in the tail or forelimb, although RVFV RNA was not detected in the affected lambs 101 . Thus, further validation of the vaccine safety of the arMP12-∆NSm21/384 candidate vaccine in pregnant animals is required to determine its suitability for use in livestock ruminants.…”
Section: Next-generation Mp-12 Vaccines: Armp12-∆nsm21/384 Rvax-1 or ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of arMP12-∆NSm21/384 were found to be equivalent to those of the original MP-12 vaccine in pregnant ewes, lambs, and calves 98 100 . arMP12-∆NSm21/384 (1 × 10 5 TCID 50 ) did not cause any fetal malformation in ewes vaccinated at 43 to 150 gestation days, while three out of 17 (18%) ewes vaccinated at 7 to 34 gestation days had fetal malformations in the tail or forelimb, although RVFV RNA was not detected in the affected lambs 101 . Thus, further validation of the vaccine safety of the arMP12-∆NSm21/384 candidate vaccine in pregnant animals is required to determine its suitability for use in livestock ruminants.…”
Section: Next-generation Mp-12 Vaccines: Armp12-∆nsm21/384 Rvax-1 or ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two MP-12 variants referred to as arMP-12ΔNSs16/198 and arMP-12ΔNSm21/384, which lack an intact NSs and P78/NSm gene, respectively, could induce protective immunity in 3 to 4-month-old young sheep, 4 to 6-month-old cattle, or pregnant ewes without safety concerns [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Notably, the neutralizing antibody responses following inoculation with arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 were stronger compared to those induced by arMP-12ΔNSs16/198 [ 58 ]. A large-scale follow-up experiment with 17 pregnant African domestic sheep vaccinated with arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 during the early stage of pregnancy (<35 days gestation) resulted in fetal malformations (forelimb malformation and deformed tail) in 18% of vaccinated ewes [ 58 ].…”
Section: Current Status Of Next-generation Live-attenuated Rvf Vaccin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the neutralizing antibody responses following inoculation with arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 were stronger compared to those induced by arMP-12ΔNSs16/198 [ 58 ]. A large-scale follow-up experiment with 17 pregnant African domestic sheep vaccinated with arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 during the early stage of pregnancy (<35 days gestation) resulted in fetal malformations (forelimb malformation and deformed tail) in 18% of vaccinated ewes [ 58 ]. At post-mortem, the tissues of dead lambs (spleen, lung, brain, and long bone) were negative for RVFV as analyzed by PCR.…”
Section: Current Status Of Next-generation Live-attenuated Rvf Vaccin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of widespread vector control, which may not be feasible given the wide distribution of mosquitoes, vaccination may be the best mitigation strategy. There has been active research in investigating potential vaccines for human and animal use, with the main focus being an eff ective vaccine that prevents the severe forms of disease while avoiding negative side eff ects [4,36,37]. It is also important that the vaccine should be stable and ideally should tolerate being stored and used in resource-limited regions where environmental factors may vary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%