2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and outcomes of cochlear implantation in the elderly: A review of recent literature

Abstract: Global demographic changes related to longevity are leading to increasing numbers of the elderly, for whom hearing loss is a significant cause of morbidity and disability. Once met with reticence, severely hearing impaired older adults are increasingly being considered for cochlear implantation (CI). Significant data indicate that CI in the elderly population is safe, well-tolerated, and effective. Risks from CI surgery and anesthesia are low and generally comparable to rates in other age groups. Outcomes stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification into performance categories of good, moderate, and poor is useful and oriented at the relevant prognostic parameters such as onset and duration of deafness, cognitive abilities, and cause of deafness. Also the age of life has an effect on the hearing outcome, especially when a so-called cognitive decline (see chapter 3.1) [9], [56] is observed. On average, new implant generations reveal a better speech understanding, which is mainly due to the progress in the processor technology and in particular in the stimulation rate ( Figure 33, Figure 34) [57].…”
Section: Post-lingually Deaf Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification into performance categories of good, moderate, and poor is useful and oriented at the relevant prognostic parameters such as onset and duration of deafness, cognitive abilities, and cause of deafness. Also the age of life has an effect on the hearing outcome, especially when a so-called cognitive decline (see chapter 3.1) [9], [56] is observed. On average, new implant generations reveal a better speech understanding, which is mainly due to the progress in the processor technology and in particular in the stimulation rate ( Figure 33, Figure 34) [57].…”
Section: Post-lingually Deaf Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification into performance categories of good, moderate, and poor is useful and oriented at the relevant prognostic parameters such as onset and duration of deafness, cognitive abilities, and cause of deafness. Also the age of life has an effect on the hearing outcome, especially when a so-called cognitive decline (see chapter 3.1) [ 9 ], [ 56 ] is observed. On average, new implant generations reveal a better speech understanding, which is mainly due to the progress in the processor technology and in particular in the stimulation rate (Figure 33 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damit kann unsere Untersuchung nicht nur die Ergebnisse vorangegangener Studien bestätigen, sondern unterstreicht auch die Geschwindigkeit der Hörrehabilitation bei älteren Patienten. Damit können die häufig in der klinischen Praxis gerade von älteren Patienten herangetragenen Bedenken einer möglicherweise langwierigen Hörrehabilitation entkräftet werden [11][12][13][14]26].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…In zahlreichen Studien konnte eine ähnlich gute Verbesserung des Sprachverstehens bei älteren verglichen mit jüngeren Patienten belegt werden. Folgerichtig wird die CI-Versorgung mittlerweile in Deutschland ohne Altershöchstgrenze durchgeführt [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified