2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00219-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety assessment of potential probiotic lactic acid bacterial strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001, Lb. acidophilus HN017, and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 in BALB/c mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
66
2
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
19
66
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the haematology, no significant differences were observed after L. fermentum AD1 application. These results agree with the findings of Zhou et al (2000), who tested potential probiotic lactic acid bacterial strains L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis in mice. The enzyme glutathione peroxidase, a component of the antioxidative defence system, was not affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Concerning the haematology, no significant differences were observed after L. fermentum AD1 application. These results agree with the findings of Zhou et al (2000), who tested potential probiotic lactic acid bacterial strains L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis in mice. The enzyme glutathione peroxidase, a component of the antioxidative defence system, was not affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…No noticeable activity or behavioral changes were observed in mice during the experimental protocol, and no illness or death occurred. Oral administration of different doses of L. salivarius REN caused no significant difference in BW, food intake, and tissue weight among the groups throughout the experiment (Table 1), which are similar with previous reports (Zhou et al, 2000;Lara-Villoslada et al, 2007a). These results demonstrate that L. salivarius REN does not exhibit gross nutrient metabolism (Swendseid, 1987), which usually apparent before any clinical symptoms (Zhou et al, 2000).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Oral administration of different doses of L. salivarius REN caused no significant difference in BW, food intake, and tissue weight among the groups throughout the experiment (Table 1), which are similar with previous reports (Zhou et al, 2000;Lara-Villoslada et al, 2007a). These results demonstrate that L. salivarius REN does not exhibit gross nutrient metabolism (Swendseid, 1987), which usually apparent before any clinical symptoms (Zhou et al, 2000). The changes of serum biochemical parameters might indicate responsive organs were affected or even damaged (Swendseid, 1987).The current study showed that oral administration of L. salivarius REN for 28 days had no adverse effects on the hematology and blood biochemistry (Table 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these observations give information on the safety of viable administration of the test strain Enterococcus faecium MBTU-P1F1 as a probiotic. Assessment of pathogenicity is one of the important components of probiotic safety studies, the indicators for which include splenomegaly and hepatomegaly (Zhou et al, 2000). Figure 6a, 6b, 6c and 6d represent the photomicrographs of the intestinal sections of the test group mice and the control group mice.…”
Section: Safety Of Viable Oral Administration Of Enterococcus Faeciummentioning
confidence: 99%