2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-011-9257-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety assessment of robot trajectories for navigation in uncertain and dynamic environments

Abstract: This paper presents a probabilistic framework for reasoning about the safety of robot trajectories in dynamic and uncertain environments with imperfect information about the future motion of surrounding objects. For safety assessment, the overall collision probability is used to rank candidate trajectories by considering the probability of colliding with known objects as well as the estimated collision probability beyond the planning horizon. In addition, we introduce a safety assessment cost metric, the proba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increased introduction of autonomous robotic ground vehicles as consumer products-such as autonomous household appliances [7] or driverless cars on regular Californian roads 1 -we face an increased need for ensuring safety not only for the sake of the consumer, but also the manufacturer. Since those robots are designed for environments that occupy stationary as well as moving obstacles, motion safety and obstacle avoidance are vital safety features for such robots [3,22,25,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the increased introduction of autonomous robotic ground vehicles as consumer products-such as autonomous household appliances [7] or driverless cars on regular Californian roads 1 -we face an increased need for ensuring safety not only for the sake of the consumer, but also the manufacturer. Since those robots are designed for environments that occupy stationary as well as moving obstacles, motion safety and obstacle avoidance are vital safety features for such robots [3,22,25,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike existing work on obstacle avoidance (e. g., [1,17,[24][25][26]), we use hybrid models and verification techniques that describe and verify the robot's discrete control choices along with its continuous, physical motion. In summary, our contributions are (i) hybrid models of navigation and obstacle avoidance control algorithms of robots, and (ii) proofs that they guarantee passive and passive friendly safety in the presence of stationary and moving obstacles despite sensor and actuator uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though comparative metrics exist for assessing the safety of specific systems, most are neither generalizable nor fully applicable across domains. Such metrics focus on equating safety with single-focus factors such as separation distance [110,111], impact force [112][113][114][115], system configuration and velocity [116], inertia [117], and cost [118]. As a result, these metrics risk falling short of their full potential by not taking into account the lessons learned by other fields of study.…”
Section: Current Trends and Next-generation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain-specific risk evaluation measures have also been applied to ensure task safety in human-robot dialog [20]. Another probabilistic model for safety assessment in dynamic environments under an imperfect sensing model was proposed in [21].…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%