2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of EEG–fMRI recordings in newborn infants at 3T: A study using a baby-size phantom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this requires simultaneous EEG data collection during scanning. While the technology and procedures for collecting these data are available, combined fMRI-EEG acquisitions have only recently begun in infants (Arichi et al, 2017;Vanhatalo, Alnajjar, Nguyen, Colditz, & Fransson, 2014).…”
Section: Subject Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this requires simultaneous EEG data collection during scanning. While the technology and procedures for collecting these data are available, combined fMRI-EEG acquisitions have only recently begun in infants (Arichi et al, 2017;Vanhatalo, Alnajjar, Nguyen, Colditz, & Fransson, 2014).…”
Section: Subject Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…79,113 Finally, methodological advances increasingly employed in adults, such as use of electroencephalography (EEG) to define subject state during acquisition, are not typically performed in this age group. As these approaches are extrapolated to neonatal populations, 114 they may provide critical information regarding key variables such as the effects of state change on rs-fMRI results. 115 The potential for artifactual discrepancies introduced into measured results by these differences in standard procedures must be considered when comparing and interpreting rs-fMRI results across investigations.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise studies on neurovascular coupling are based on concomitant measurements of brain hemodynamics and brain function (electrical activity of the brain). This can be done by combining EEG measurements with fMRI measurements (Mullinger and Bowtell, 2011), with fNIRS measurements (Shin et al, 2018) or with positron emission tomography measurements (Juhász et al, 2000), although such studies are challenging from a technical point of view due to for example electrode heating (Vanhatalo et al, 2014) and the presence of numerous artifacts (Galderisi et al, 2016; Abrue et al, 2018). Therefore, such studies are very scarce, especially in (preterm) neonates.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%