2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of switching to Migalastat from enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: Experience from the Phase 3 ATTRACT study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors showed that renal function was maintained during 18 months of migalastat or ERT; moreover, migalastat significantly reduced cardiac mass compared with ERT, and no difference was reported on the other evaluated endpoints (renal, cardiac or cerebrovascular events, plasma lyso-Gb3 concentration, and patient-reported outcomes) [ 12 ]. Finally, the switch of treatment was well tolerated, as highlighted by the same authors in the following paper [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors showed that renal function was maintained during 18 months of migalastat or ERT; moreover, migalastat significantly reduced cardiac mass compared with ERT, and no difference was reported on the other evaluated endpoints (renal, cardiac or cerebrovascular events, plasma lyso-Gb3 concentration, and patient-reported outcomes) [ 12 ]. Finally, the switch of treatment was well tolerated, as highlighted by the same authors in the following paper [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although there has not been yet a consensus on when to choose migalastat over ERT, some criteria have been developed, which include: age 16 years and older, a confirmed amenable mutation, an eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , compliance with every-other-day oral administration, and no intention by female patients to become pregnant. Patients' preference and hypersensitivity to ERT are also factors in considering the best treatment option [13]. Theoretically, the chaperoning of α-Gal by migalastat to lysosomes may better mimic natural enzyme trafficking and result in more constant α-Gal activity than ERT [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the approval of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), it become the most popular treatment option for Fabry disease. Orally administered pharmacological chaperone migalastat hydrochloride also provide a beneficial effect on GLA amenable mutations [30]. Recent study showed that >28% Japanese families had amenable mutations to migalastat [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent study showed that >28% Japanese families had amenable mutations to migalastat [31]. However, timing the initiation of therapy is most crucial to get maximum beneficial effects [30,32,33]. The international guidelines for ERT are also being set up for presymptomatic patients [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the opinion of Authors, and based on the results of the ATTRACT study, given the possibility of oral therapy and its efficacy and safety, switching to migalastat can be considered in: (i) unstable patients with clinical evidence of progression of FD, in particular GI symptoms, cardiac hypertrophy and CNS events, (ii) patients with uncontrolled infusion reactions, (iii) patients with oor compliance to i.v. chronic infusions, as shown in the ATTRACT trial [15,52].…”
Section: Migalastat In Patients With Ert Failure/intolerancementioning
confidence: 86%