2019
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20190019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in a patient with deep brain stimulation electrodes

Abstract: Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated in movement disorders, making it a therapeutic alternative in clinical settings. However, there is still no consensus on the most appropriate treatment protocols in most cases, and the presence of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes has been regarded as a contraindication to the procedure. We recently studied the effects of cerebellar tDCS on a female patient already undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same is true for a case study in a single female patient with implanted DBS electrodes, where tDCS was used as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of generalized dystonia and proved to be well tolerated [18]. In addition to limited sample size, the absence of long-term follow-up data prevents assessment of sustained effects and potential risks associated with such a combination therapy [18]. Comparisons of various tDCS montages, both with intact skulls and simulated burr holes, indicated little effect on peak current density and E-fields, suggesting that the presence of a DBS lead might not significantly alter brain current flow under realistic conditions when the burrhole defect is fluid-filled and relatively conductive [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same is true for a case study in a single female patient with implanted DBS electrodes, where tDCS was used as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of generalized dystonia and proved to be well tolerated [18]. In addition to limited sample size, the absence of long-term follow-up data prevents assessment of sustained effects and potential risks associated with such a combination therapy [18]. Comparisons of various tDCS montages, both with intact skulls and simulated burr holes, indicated little effect on peak current density and E-fields, suggesting that the presence of a DBS lead might not significantly alter brain current flow under realistic conditions when the burrhole defect is fluid-filled and relatively conductive [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, only a small sample size (two patients) was considered and no systematic investigation was performed, which limits the generalizability of the findings. The same is true for a case study in a single female patient with implanted DBS electrodes, where tDCS was used as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of generalized dystonia and proved to be well tolerated [18]. In addition to limited sample size, the absence of long-term follow-up data prevents assessment of sustained effects and potential risks associated with such a combination therapy [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statements that are 1) sufficiently vague as to confound implementation; 2) lack evidence-base for risk (see above); and/or 3) contrast with existing use-cases are removed. For example, warnings/precautions regarding implants can be ambiguous regarding what types of devices qualify (e.g., dental implants), are not supported by evidence for risk, and contradict with use-cases of stimulation with intracranial implants [ 39 43 ] or pacemakers [ 44 ]. There is also evidence for the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which involves intensities above (~400x; [ 45 , 46 ]) those relevant for this limited-output guidance, with implants without injury [ 47 49 ].…”
Section: Updates To Warnings and Precautions: General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since tDCS applies electricity to the human body artificially, in principle, it should not be conducted when an electrical device is implanted in the body. However, Iannone et al [ 34 ] conducted 15 sessions of 30-minute cerebellar tDCS at 2 mA intensity with a 35 cm 2 electrode in patients who had deep brain stimulators (DBSs) in the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of generalized dystonia. The DBSs were turned off while tDCS stimulation was delivered.…”
Section: Safety Of Implanted Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%