Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Computing hardware and reservoir simulation technologies continue to evolve in order to meet the ever-increasing requirement for improving computational performance and efficiency in the oil and gas industry. These improvements have enabled the simulation of larger and more complex reservoir models. When working with steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations, determining the optimal steam injection rates and allocation of steam among various multi-well pads is very important, especially given the high cost of steam generation and the current low oil price environment. As SAGD operations mature, steam chambers start to coalesce and interact with each other, forcing producers to face declining oil rates and increasing steam oil ratios (SOR). Operators must work to reduce injection rates on declining wells to maintain a low SOR and free up capacity for newer, more productive wells. Steam injection and allocation between wells and multiple pads then becomes an exercise of optimizing cost, and improving productivity and net present value (NPV). A case study is performed on a full field SAGD model by optimizing steam delivery aided by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning enabled algorithms for automated numerical tuning, and dynamic gridding technologies. The model contains 15 pads, 96 well pairs (192 wells), 12.6 million active simulation grid blocks, and represents a typical Athabasca formation geology and fluid properties. The proposed steam delivery optimization considers two main scenarios. The first scenario considers the case in which steam generation capacity is limited, and the optimization process intelligently determines the optimal well and pad level steam injection rates dynamically during the life of the project. The second scenario assumes that steam generation availability is not constrained and the field development plan is optimized based on steam required for maximum recovery from the field as fast as possible. A full field optimized development plan is created for the 15 SAGD pads and 96 well pairs. Following the optimization, an increase in NPV and reduction in SOR is achieved for the entire field due to the efficient utilization of total available steam. The optimization study required several full field SAGD simulations to be completed in a practical time period, demonstrating that workflows such as this can be carried out for full field thermal models. These models can also be used to evaluate production responses due to varying operating strategies in the field. This paper presents the optimization of steam allocation for a full field, multi pad SAGD simulation model. It demonstrates that advances in computing and reservoir simulation technology have enabled the simulation of full field models within a reasonable timeframe, allowing engineers to tackle a new class of problems that were previously impractical.
Computing hardware and reservoir simulation technologies continue to evolve in order to meet the ever-increasing requirement for improving computational performance and efficiency in the oil and gas industry. These improvements have enabled the simulation of larger and more complex reservoir models. When working with steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations, determining the optimal steam injection rates and allocation of steam among various multi-well pads is very important, especially given the high cost of steam generation and the current low oil price environment. As SAGD operations mature, steam chambers start to coalesce and interact with each other, forcing producers to face declining oil rates and increasing steam oil ratios (SOR). Operators must work to reduce injection rates on declining wells to maintain a low SOR and free up capacity for newer, more productive wells. Steam injection and allocation between wells and multiple pads then becomes an exercise of optimizing cost, and improving productivity and net present value (NPV). A case study is performed on a full field SAGD model by optimizing steam delivery aided by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning enabled algorithms for automated numerical tuning, and dynamic gridding technologies. The model contains 15 pads, 96 well pairs (192 wells), 12.6 million active simulation grid blocks, and represents a typical Athabasca formation geology and fluid properties. The proposed steam delivery optimization considers two main scenarios. The first scenario considers the case in which steam generation capacity is limited, and the optimization process intelligently determines the optimal well and pad level steam injection rates dynamically during the life of the project. The second scenario assumes that steam generation availability is not constrained and the field development plan is optimized based on steam required for maximum recovery from the field as fast as possible. A full field optimized development plan is created for the 15 SAGD pads and 96 well pairs. Following the optimization, an increase in NPV and reduction in SOR is achieved for the entire field due to the efficient utilization of total available steam. The optimization study required several full field SAGD simulations to be completed in a practical time period, demonstrating that workflows such as this can be carried out for full field thermal models. These models can also be used to evaluate production responses due to varying operating strategies in the field. This paper presents the optimization of steam allocation for a full field, multi pad SAGD simulation model. It demonstrates that advances in computing and reservoir simulation technology have enabled the simulation of full field models within a reasonable timeframe, allowing engineers to tackle a new class of problems that were previously impractical.
Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFITs) provide a critical piece of information on the competency of the top seal for injection projects and are therefore essential for Subsurface Containment Assurance (SCA) and Maximum Operating Pressure (MOP) determination. Results of DFITs provide the best estimate for the minimum principal stress component, which is a major input for tensile and shear failure tolerance analysis. Therefore, best practices in execution and analysis of DFITs is extremely important for safe and successful operations. Numerous DFITs have been conducted over the past ten years in Surmont to assess the integrity of the caprock and determine the maximum allowable steam injection pressure. A combination of surveillance and coupled reservoir-geomechanics simulations have been utilized to maintain a minimum of 20% safety factor for caprock failure. The tangent analysis method for determining fracture closure pressure has been extensively used in the past decade for DFIT analysis in the industry [1 and 2]. The validity of this method has been challenged recently through more rigorous modeling of the hydraulic fracturing process and field observations. An alternative analysis method referred to as the compliance method has been proposed and successfully used in many cases [3]. In the past few years, we have demonstrated the potential to safely increase the maximum operating pressure and its impact on production, through extensive caprock integrity analysis in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) operations [4 and 5]. In this study, the DFITs carried out in Surmont were revisited to assess the potential impact of characterizing in-situ stresses with improved accuracy on maximum allowable injection pressure and ultimately production uplift. The analysis shows higher minimum horizontal stresses in the caprock are supported by field observations, which could potentially allow for higher injecting pressure and close to five percent additional production in the two selected SAGD pads.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.