2009
DOI: 10.1167/9.3.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saliency, attention, and visual search: An information theoretic approach

Abstract: A proposal for saliency computation within the visual cortex is put forth based on the premise that localized saliency computation serves to maximize information sampled from one's environment. The model is built entirely on computational constraints but nevertheless results in an architecture with cells and connectivity reminiscent of that appearing in the visual cortex. It is demonstrated that a variety of visual search behaviors appear as emergent properties of the model and therefore basic principles of co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
616
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 745 publications
(634 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
8
616
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Bruce and Tsotsos 2009) is usually used to evaluate the effectiveness of detection. This curve pays attention to the judgment of the existence of a target not the location of it.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Bruce and Tsotsos 2009) is usually used to evaluate the effectiveness of detection. This curve pays attention to the judgment of the existence of a target not the location of it.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate this point, we select 8 state-of-the-art models (GBVS [3], Judd [14], RARE2012 [15], AWS [5], Le Meur [4], Bruce [7], Hou [8] and Itti [6]) and aggregate their saliency maps into a unique one. The following subsections present the tested aggregation methods.…”
Section: Context and Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies are related to the quality of the prediction but also to the saliency map representation. Indeed some models output very focused saliency maps [3][4][5] whereas the distribution of saliency values is much more uniform in other models [6,7]. Others tend to emphasize more on the image edges [8], the color or luminance contrast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each psychophysical pattern, we calculate the saliency maps for PCT, P 2 CA and 3 stateof-the-art attention models: PQFT from Guo and Zhang (2010), AIM from Bruce and Tsotsos (2009), and ITTI from Itti et al (1998). The results are shown in Figs.…”
Section: Psychophysical Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our P 2 CA model has a computational complexity of O ((MN) 2 ). The computational procedures of AIM and ITTI are comparatively complex (see Bruce and Tsotsos 2009;Itti et al 1998), and some computational details were not shown in literature, but in their toolboxes that are coded in Matlab. Therefore, it is difficult for us to give a precise computational complexity of these two models.…”
Section: Computational Costmentioning
confidence: 99%