1952
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/91.1.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salmonellosis in Dogs: III. Prevalence in Dogs in Veterinary Hospitals, Pounds and Boarding Kennels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1953
1953
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in isolation rates may be due to the fact that rectal swabs of live dogs were taken from the pound whereas Ojo (1994) sampled the dry intestinal contents of dead dogs which would have been detrimental to the survival of the pathogen. Results of the present study however compare favourably with prevalences ranging from 7.8 to 15.8% reported elsewhere (McElrath et al., 1952; Khan, 1970; Shimi et al., 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The difference in isolation rates may be due to the fact that rectal swabs of live dogs were taken from the pound whereas Ojo (1994) sampled the dry intestinal contents of dead dogs which would have been detrimental to the survival of the pathogen. Results of the present study however compare favourably with prevalences ranging from 7.8 to 15.8% reported elsewhere (McElrath et al., 1952; Khan, 1970; Shimi et al., 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Salmonella excretion rates for asymptomatic dogs ranged from 0 to 43%. Faecal samples from dogs in boarding kennels, dog pounds and veterinary hospitals occasionally yielded more than one serovar from a single sample, four serovars being isolated in one instance (McElrath et al, 1952). Generally, there was a lower excretion rate in household pet dogs, compared with those confined to kennels.…”
Section: Excreter Statementioning
confidence: 99%