2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2010.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAMAC: A Cross-Layer Communication Protocol for Sensor Networks with Sectored Antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several existing protocols, for example, include a distinct discovery phase [8]. Our results demonstrate that after the initial discovery phase continuous monitoring and adaptation is necessary as the initial configuration may turn out to perform poorly in the long term.…”
Section: Temporal Variationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several existing protocols, for example, include a distinct discovery phase [8]. Our results demonstrate that after the initial discovery phase continuous monitoring and adaptation is necessary as the initial configuration may turn out to perform poorly in the long term.…”
Section: Temporal Variationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the absence of studies like the one we present in this paper, researchers made implicit assumptions about the stability of links [7,8]. Our results show that, for example, many of the existing mechanisms to select the preferred antenna configuration need to be complemented with mechanisms that continuously evaluate if the current selection of active antenna directions is still the preferred configuration, or if adaption is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EXISTING SYSTEM In existing system SAMAC [2] is used, SAMAC is a cross-layer model that combines the slotted operation of the MAC protocol with the direction of the attached sectored direction antennas. It uses a different approach by using sectored antenna which helps in increasing throughput, delivery ratio and the energy consumption.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Death of central point is the end of the system. In contrast to it, decentralized architecture needs powerful autonomous entities on one hand, and [44], fault detection [45], self-con�guration [46] Arti�cial immune network [34] Immune system [47] Misbehavior detection [48], image pattern recognition [49] Genetic algorithm [35] Natural evolution system Dynamic shortest path routing [50], lifetime maximization [51] Cellular automata [29] Life Life like/ game of life Large network simulations [52], area coverage scheme [53] Rendering (computer graphics) [30] Patterns of animal skins, birds feathers, mollusk shells, and bacterial colonies [54] Range-free localization [55] Fractal geometry Clouds, river networks, snow�akes, cauli�ower or broccoli, and systems of blood vessels and pulmonary vessels, ocean waves Antenna designing [56] Communication networks and protocols Epidemiology Cross-layer communication protocol [57,58] [61], target tracking [62] then it also re�ects the behavior of adaptation (�exible to changing environment), self-assembly (unit to be one), selforganizing (interaction for the one), and self-regulation, (keeping the process tunably smooth) [25] as in WSN due to the distributed knowledge, distributed control and scalable properties on the other hand. Although the architecture is application dependent, decentralized system has variety of advantages over the centralized system.…”
Section: � �Rom �Eal To �Rti��ialmentioning
confidence: 99%