With John Martin's discovery that iron could be a limiting nutrient in phytoplankton growth (Martin and Fitzwater 1988), marine trace metal biogeochemistry has evolved, with more fieldwork devoted to obtaining trace metal samples, more groups participating in trace metal investigations, and increasing inclusion of trace metal parameters in marine models of nutrient and climate cycles. In 2003, the international GEOTRACES program was founded, which aimed to establish global trace element distributions and quantify the fluxes and processes that affect these distributions under variable hydrographic and biogeochemical regimes. The positive international response to this program and the monetary commitment for cruises made by so many countries is a testament to the maturation of the trace metal field.As interest in trace metal biogeochemistry has grown, the technology associated with collecting uncontaminated seawater samples and analyzing low metal concentrations in seawater's complex matrix has developed as well. However, in response to the limited calibration of the now numerous sample collection, handling, and analytical methods used in the community, an intercalibration committee was established from the inception of the GEOTRACES program to lead and oversee these comparison efforts. The power of an international collaboration is the ability to share the manpower and monetary responsibility for collecting and analyzing globally, but the comparison is only as strong as the many methods can intercalibrate.Depending on the measurement and metal of interest, there are many points at which analytical and sampling offsets can occur: precleaning (filters, bottles), sample collection (samplers, hydrowire), sample treatment (filtration, handling, acidification), sample processing (leaching, pre-concentra-
An intercalibration between the GEOTRACES GO-FLO and the MITESS/Vanes sampling systems for dissolved iron concentration analyses (and a closer look at adsorption effects)
AbstractAn intercalibration of dissolved iron (dFe) concentrations was conducted from samples collected on the GEO-TRACES Pacific Intercalibration cruise using two different sampling devices: the GEOTRACES GO-FLO rosette system and MITESS/Vane samplers. At each depth, the dFe concentrations were identical within analytical error, except at 500 m where contamination in one bottle is suspected. dFe adsorption kinetics to bottle walls was also investigated. Over 29 h, 18% of the dFe adsorbed to the walls of 1 L bottles, whereas over 15 h, 19% adsorbed to the walls of 250 mL bottles, suggesting a relationship between dFe adsorption and sample bottle surface area to volume ratio. Contrary to expectations that refrigeration would slow adsorption, cold 250 mL bottles demonstrated a 29% dFe loss over 15 h compared to 19% loss at room temperature. Finally, we tested the hypothesis that the decreasing dFe observed in successive sub-sampled bottles from the (unacidified) SAFe D1 tank was due not only to adsorption but also to pH-dependent Fe solubility changes ...