1986
DOI: 10.1080/08828032.1986.10390516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling with Gas Bags I: Losses of Analyte with Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with others who have shown that recovery of certain VFAs, phenolic compounds, and indolic compounds from Tedlar bags are lower with increased residence time in the bag (Keener et al, 2002; Koziel et al, 2005). In fact, Posner and Woodfin (1986) recommend storage of air in Tedlar bags to be <4 h. The results of this study show that hold times as short as 0.5 h result in significant changes in odorant concentration for samples stored in Tedlar bags. While low storage temperatures (−20°C) clearly reduced the losses for certain odorants, severe and complete losses of other key livestock odorants, such as indole and 3‐methyl indole, indicate that this method is unacceptable as a sample preservation strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our results are consistent with others who have shown that recovery of certain VFAs, phenolic compounds, and indolic compounds from Tedlar bags are lower with increased residence time in the bag (Keener et al, 2002; Koziel et al, 2005). In fact, Posner and Woodfin (1986) recommend storage of air in Tedlar bags to be <4 h. The results of this study show that hold times as short as 0.5 h result in significant changes in odorant concentration for samples stored in Tedlar bags. While low storage temperatures (−20°C) clearly reduced the losses for certain odorants, severe and complete losses of other key livestock odorants, such as indole and 3‐methyl indole, indicate that this method is unacceptable as a sample preservation strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…17 The breath was then flowed into the SIFT over a period of about one minute whilst the downstream mass spectrometer was scanned over the mass range 10 u to 100 u. In this way several trace gases are detected and quantified simultaneously, including ammonia, but obviously the concentrations determined in this way are not the alveolar (peak) concentrations but rather some mean concentrations resulting from the mixing of alveolar breath and breath from the mouth and the upper airways.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As VOCs collected in sampling bags were typically analyzed within a short period of time (usually less than 24-48 hours after sampling) [5,15,19], there were also a few experiments for analysis within three days. e stability of VOCs from stationary sources in the refinery and petrochemistry was evaluated in the sampling bags for 6 days in this study.…”
Section: Experimental Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole-air sampling and sorbent-based tubes sampling methods are the most widely used techniques for collecting gaseous VOCs under on-site or laboratory conditions [14,15]. Among them, whole-air sampling techniques include airbag sampling and tank sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%