2014 International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/dsaa.2014.7058124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR target recognition based on deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [30] firstly indicated that one single convolutional layer could effectively extract SAR targets feature representation with unsupervised learning using randomly sampled SAR targets patches and achieve the accuracy of 84.7% in 10-class classification tasks. Morgan et al [31] proposed an architecture of three convolutional layers, following a fully connected layer of Softmax as a classifier, increasing the accuracy to 92.3%.…”
Section: Sar Target Recognition With Cnnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [30] firstly indicated that one single convolutional layer could effectively extract SAR targets feature representation with unsupervised learning using randomly sampled SAR targets patches and achieve the accuracy of 84.7% in 10-class classification tasks. Morgan et al [31] proposed an architecture of three convolutional layers, following a fully connected layer of Softmax as a classifier, increasing the accuracy to 92.3%.…”
Section: Sar Target Recognition With Cnnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, besides the convolution and activation operations (i.e., nonlinearity) that are the building blocks of an image classification CNN, we may want to use the transformations that take into account the correlation properties of the images given by (31)-(32). Reports about successful application of deep learning to the problems of automated target recognition in standard SAR images are encouraging [24,25], but at the same time the scarcity of the real data and the difficulties in augmenting it with modelled data are recognized as a major problem [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we compare the performance of our method with that of the CNN [13], label propagation (LP) [19], and progressive semisupervised SVM with diversity (PS3VM-D) [18]. The CNN is a fully supervised algorithm which only utilizes the labelled samples to train the classification model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental result showed that the CNN method outperforms the Gabor feature extraction-based SVM method, which demonstrated a great potential of the CNN for SAR image recognition. A convolutional network was designed in [13] to automatically extract the features for SAR target recognition. Using the learned convolutional features, the accuracy of 84.7% was achieved on the 10 types of targets in the MSTAR dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%