2017 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2017.7944260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR target recognition via incremental nonnegative matrix factorization with L<inf>p</inf> sparse constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous study proposed a novel incremental nonnegative matrix factorization (INMF) and experiments were carried out with respect to recognition performance and efficiency in order to overcome the defects that conventional methods have in online processing. For details, please refer to [22].…”
Section: Incremental Nmf For Sar Target Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previous study proposed a novel incremental nonnegative matrix factorization (INMF) and experiments were carried out with respect to recognition performance and efficiency in order to overcome the defects that conventional methods have in online processing. For details, please refer to [22].…”
Section: Incremental Nmf For Sar Target Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N is the number of samples. The definitions in Equations (22) and (23) refer to W * and H * , which are ground truth. The ground truth is derived from the direct matrix operation rather than the INMF iteration.…”
Section: Experiments On the Error Of The Decomposition Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al (2014) advanced incremental graph regulated NMF (IGNMF) to achieve a better classification by maintaining the neighborhood distribution structure of the original highdimensional data during the process of dimension reduction. Dang et al (2017) integrated sparse constraints with incremental learning to devise an incremental NMF with L 1/2 sparse constraints (L 1/2 INMF) and successfully applied it to SAR image recognition. Wang and Sun (2017) introduced an incremental learning algorithm based on graph regularized NMF with sparseness constraints (IGNMFSC) and its effectiveness is verified by face recognition experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different features have been explored to characterize the target signal [4,5], such as scattering centre features [6,7], filter bank features [3,8], pattern structure features [9,10] and statistical features [1,11]. Recently, low-rank matrix factorization (LMF), a particularly useful technique for data representation, has been developed for SAR ATR [12,13]. Specifically, LMF aims to find two matrices Z and H or more lower-dimensional matrices whose product provides a good low-dimensional approximation to the original matrix X such that X ≈ ZH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cui et al [12] proposed L 1/2 -norm regularized NMF for sparsely representing SAR images. Dang et al [13] used incremental NMF with an L p -norm constraint to further improve performance. Babaee et al [14] introduced two NMF variants, i.e., variance-constrained NMF and centre map NMF, to describe SAR images in an interactive system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%