2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8080683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR Target Recognition via Supervised Discriminative Dictionary Learning and Sparse Representation of the SAR-HOG Feature

Abstract: Automatic target recognition (ATR) in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images plays an important role in both national defense and civil applications. Although many methods have been proposed, SAR ATR is still very challenging due to the complex application environment. Feature extraction and classification are key points in SAR ATR. In this paper, we first design a novel feature, which is a histogram of oriented gradients (HOG)-like feature for SAR ATR (called SAR-HOG). Then, we propose a supervised discriminat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is 8.67%, 5.43%, 5.68%, 2.85%, 4.09% better than SVM, sparse representation of monogenic signal (MSRC) [18], tri-task joint sparse representation (TJSR) [48], supervised discriminative dictionary learning and sparse representation (SDDLSR) [8] and joint dynamic sparse representation (JDSR) [49]. In addition, our method can achieve a comparable performance to the state-of-the-art methods based on deep learning (A-ConvNet [24] and DCHUN [50]), shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: The Effectiveness Of Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is 8.67%, 5.43%, 5.68%, 2.85%, 4.09% better than SVM, sparse representation of monogenic signal (MSRC) [18], tri-task joint sparse representation (TJSR) [48], supervised discriminative dictionary learning and sparse representation (SDDLSR) [8] and joint dynamic sparse representation (JDSR) [49]. In addition, our method can achieve a comparable performance to the state-of-the-art methods based on deep learning (A-ConvNet [24] and DCHUN [50]), shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: The Effectiveness Of Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, various types of classifiers, such as sparse representation-based method [2], Bayes classifier [3], mean square error (MSE) classifier [4], template-based classifiers [5] and support vector machine (SVM) [6], are selected to solve the problem. Among them, the sparse representation classification is popular in recent studies [7,8]. The improved joint sparse representation model was proposed to effectively combine multiple-view SAR images from the same physical target [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2006 [31], plenty of recovery algorithms have been developed for solving the MMV problems [32,33], such as the Focal Undetermined System Solver method [34] and the Basis Pursuit method [35,36] They can be divided into two categories, the convex optimization and the greedy method. In this paper, one of the greedy algorithms, OMP (Orthogonal Matching Pursuit), is discussed because of its robustness and simplicity.…”
Section: Recovery Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resurgent development of many theoretical analysis frameworks [22,23] and effective algorithms [24] has been witnessed. The applications of the sparse signal representation technique mainly include radar imaging [25,26], image restoration [27], image classification [28,29], and pattern recognition [15,30]. The key of sparse signal model is based on the fact that a certain signal can be represented by an overcomplete basis set (dictionary).…”
Section: Srcmentioning
confidence: 99%