2016
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcasm in Written Communication: Emoticons are Efficient Markers of Intention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus we propose to give a highly efficient method [12] of finding the sentiment of the person by analysing the text messages and also processing emoticons. Emoticons [25] are very common tokens in any text message in the new world, therefore we must also focus on efficient ways to analyse them. We have converted emoticons to textual form for our computation processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus we propose to give a highly efficient method [12] of finding the sentiment of the person by analysing the text messages and also processing emoticons. Emoticons [25] are very common tokens in any text message in the new world, therefore we must also focus on efficient ways to analyse them. We have converted emoticons to textual form for our computation processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emoticons are classified into following two categories: Positive emoticons: these are the emoticons which convey positive sentiment and are replaced by positive words based on the symbol [25]. …”
Section: Model Components Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike face-to-face communications, where nonverbal cues are simultaneously sent as the complements to help clarify verbal messages, early CMCs lacked non-verbal cues, largely constraining its communicative ability (Lo, 2008;Walther & D'Addario, 2001). The development and adoption of emojis helped address this issue by providing communicators with an easy way to add non-verbal cues on their verbal messages in the CMC (Derks, Bos, & Von Grumbkow, 2008;Thompson & Filik, 2016;Yuasa, Saito, & Mukawa, 2011). Currently, there are two general types of emojis, namely, face emojis and non-face emojis (Riordan, 2017a).…”
Section: The Communicative Role Of Emojismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face emojis were evolved from its predecessor, emoticons (i.e., emotional icons), while non-face emojis were added later as the extension (Thompson & Filik, 2016). Because of its early emergence as emoticons, face emojis were the major focus of previous research, and their communicative roles have been studied widely.…”
Section: The Communicative Role Of Emojismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation