2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41577-021-00662-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals: measurement, causes and impact

Abstract: Breakthrough infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in fully vaccinated individuals are receiving intense scrutiny because of their importance in determining how long restrictions to control virus transmission will need to remain in place in highly vaccinated populations as well as in determining the need for additional vaccine doses or changes to the vaccine formulations and/or dosing intervals. Measurement of breakthrough infections is challenging outside of randomized, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
239
0
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
4
239
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a study from South Africa estimated VE against infection at 33% in the Omicron period compared to 77% in the pre-Omicron period. 19 Direct comparisons to other jurisdictions are challenging 20 due to differences in study methodology, outcome definitions (i.e., symptomatic infection vs. any infection), vaccination policies (i.e., homologous vs. heterologous vaccine schedules, third dose eligibility criteria, product-specific policies), population age structures, and public health measures that were in place during the study period (e.g., vaccine certificates, mask mandates 21 ). Despite this, the general trends across the studies are similar, demonstrating substantially lower VE against Omicron infection than for previous SARS-CoV-2 variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a study from South Africa estimated VE against infection at 33% in the Omicron period compared to 77% in the pre-Omicron period. 19 Direct comparisons to other jurisdictions are challenging 20 due to differences in study methodology, outcome definitions (i.e., symptomatic infection vs. any infection), vaccination policies (i.e., homologous vs. heterologous vaccine schedules, third dose eligibility criteria, product-specific policies), population age structures, and public health measures that were in place during the study period (e.g., vaccine certificates, mask mandates 21 ). Despite this, the general trends across the studies are similar, demonstrating substantially lower VE against Omicron infection than for previous SARS-CoV-2 variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the estimates of vaccine effectiveness and the magnitude of waning protection (ie, RRs in this study) should be interpreted with caution owing to challenges in estimating risk of infection and severe outcomes among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in observational studies. 4,5 Notwithstanding these methodological limitations, the finding that protection with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 wanes is crucial, because ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is one of the most widely used vaccines and its effectiveness against the omicron variant has yet to be characterised. Preliminary data show that the antibodies from a three-dose course of mRNA vaccines neutralise omicron, although all the studies report a notable drop in neutralising antibody titres compared with earlier variants such as delta.…”
Section: Managing Waning Vaccine Protection Against Sars-cov-2 Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the estimates of vaccine effectiveness and the magnitude of waning protection (ie, RRs in this study) should be interpreted with caution owing to challenges in estimating risk of infection and severe outcomes among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in observational studies. 4 , 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would enable comparisons of naive patients with vaccinated and previously infected patients. Lipsitch et al speculate that a higher viral inoculum might reduce vaccine efficacy [54]; future SIMCoV experiments can assess how the number of FOI impact T cell control of infection in vaccinated people. SIMCoV could also be used to study other respiratory diseases, such as influenza, or even be extended to model infection in other organs.…”
Section: Caveats Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%