SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance System in Canada: Longitudinal Trend Analysis

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 global pandemic has disrupted structures and communities across the globe. Numerous regions of the world have had varying responses in their attempts to contain the spread of the virus. Factors such as public health policies, governance, and sociopolitical climate have led to differential levels of success at controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Ultimately, a more advanced surveillance metric for COVID-19 transmission is necessary to help government systems and national leaders understand which responses have been effective and gauge where outbreaks occur. Objective The goal of this study is to provide advanced COVID-19 surveillance metrics for Canada at the country, province, and territory level that account for shifts in the pandemic including speed, acceleration, jerk, and persistence. Enhanced surveillance identifies risks for explosive growth and regions that have controlled outbreaks successfully. Methods Using a longitudinal trend analysis study design, we extracted 62 days of COVID-19 data from Canadian public health registries for 13 provinces and territories. We used an empirical difference equation to measure the daily number of cases in Canada as a function of the prior number of cases, the level of testing, and weekly shift variables based on a dynamic panel model that was estimated using the generalized method of moments approach by implementing the Arellano-Bond estimator in R. Results We compare the week of February 7-13, 2021, with the week of February 14-20, 2021. Canada, as a whole, had a decrease in speed from 8.4 daily new cases per 100,000 population to 7.5 daily new cases per 100,000 population. The persistence of new cases during the week of February 14-20 reported 7.5 cases that are a result of COVID-19 transmissions 7 days earlier. The two most populous provinces of Ontario and Quebec both experienced decreases in speed from 7.9 and 11.5 daily new cases per 100,000 population for the week of February 7-13 to speeds of 6.9 and 9.3 for the week of February 14-20, respectively. Nunavut experienced a significant increase in speed during this time, from 3.3 daily new cases per 100,000 population to 10.9 daily new cases per 100,000 population. Conclusions Canada excelled at COVID-19 control early on in the pandemic, especially during the first COVID-19 shutdown. The second wave at the end of 2020 resulted in a resurgence of the outbreak, which has since been controlled. Enhanced surveillance identifies outbreaks and where there is the potential for explosive growth, which informs proactive health policy.

The Public Health Governance of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…Most of these papers were published in 2021 and focus on monitoring the transmission characteristics of COVID-19 around the world, including in Central Asia [ 13 ], the USA [ 14 ], Canada [ 15 ], Europe [ 16 ], the Middle East and South Africa [ 17 ]. All five papers apply the dynamic panel data (DPD) model approach proposed by Oehmke et al (2020).…”

Surveillance Metrics and History of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central Asia: Updated Epidemiological Assessment

“…We can think of the latter measure as the echoing forward of cases. These metrics were tested and validated in prior research [9,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. For this study, we use both traditional and enhanced surveillance metrics to analyze the possible end to the pandemic in Central Asia.…”

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Biomass Supply Chains: The Case of the Canadian Wood Pellet Industry

“…The impact of the pandemic varied between provinces and sectors but overall, mandated closures and other measures had a significant impact on the national [4] and global economy [37]. The first wave of COVID-19 infections in March 2020 was initially localized in Québec and Ontario, Canada's most populated provinces [32]. The rapid rise in cases nationally and concerns over hospital capacity resulted in provincial stay-at-home orders, layoffs, recommendations against international travel, and a closure of the border with the United States.…”