2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13111551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite DEM Improvement Using Multispectral Imagery and an Artificial Neural Network

Abstract: The digital elevation model (DEM) is crucial for various applications, such as land management and flood planning, as it reflects the actual topographic characteristic on the Earth’s surface. However, it is quite a challenge to acquire the high-quality DEM, as it is very time-consuming, costly, and often confidential. This paper explores a DEM improvement scheme using an artificial neural network (ANN) that could improve the German Aerospace’s TanDEM-X (12 m resolution). The ANN was first trained in Nice, Fran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the preliminary stage of this study, we assessed generalized linear models (GLMs) and generalized additive models (GAM). Neural networks have also been used successfully at the quasi-global scale for the CoastalDEM [31] and at the local scale [37][38][39]. We found random forests to be accurate, computationally efficient and robust, hence an appropriate choice for this application.…”
Section: Random Forest Regressionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the preliminary stage of this study, we assessed generalized linear models (GLMs) and generalized additive models (GAM). Neural networks have also been used successfully at the quasi-global scale for the CoastalDEM [31] and at the local scale [37][38][39]. We found random forests to be accurate, computationally efficient and robust, hence an appropriate choice for this application.…”
Section: Random Forest Regressionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although there have been promising recent developments [35], the removal of buildings from MERIT at the global scale has not yet occurred, and thus MERIT cannot be considered completely as a DTM. With the rich amount of auxiliary data related to global building and forest coverage now available, there is increasing potential to utilise machine learning techniques to remove trees [31], buildings [35,36] or both [37][38][39], although to date these studies are limited to the local or quasi global scale. Machine learning allows us to 'learn by example' by building empirical models from the data alone and is particularly well suited to non-linear settings [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be inferred that the inconsistency with the SRTM DEM and ICESat-2 results in low accuracy of the SRTM DEM in bare land. In the future, we will use an Artificial Neural Network approach [28] that fully considers the attribute features (slope, canopy height, canopy cover, etc.) to correct the elevation error of the SRTM DEM in forested areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where H SRTM and H TCP represent the elevation of the SRTM DEM and that of the TCP from ICESat-2 ATL08 products, respectively. According to the first law of geography, everything is related to other things, and similar things are more closely related [28]. Therefore, a continuous elevation error correction surface for the SRTM DEM is derived by the inverse distance weighted (IDW) spatial interpolation method based on some discrete TCPs.…”
Section: Interpolating the Elevation Correction Surface Of The Srtm Demmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the resolution and accuracy of the fusion results depend on the input DEMs. In addition, the systematic errors in TanDEM-X DEM products are fitted and further removed using machine learning algorithms with the assistance of high accuracy observations of the elevation point acquired by GPS, LiDAR, Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat), Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) sensors, and so on [24]. These algorithms show a good performance on systematic error reduction, but a poor improvement on the reduction of random errors in TanDEM-X DEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%