Satisfacción de las mujeres con la experiencia del parto: validación de la Mackey Satisfaction Childbirth Rating Scale

Más-Pons, Rosa; Barona-Vilar, Carmen; Carreguí-Vilar, Soledad; Ibáñez-Gil, Noelia; Margaix-Fontestad, Lourdes; Escribà‐Agüir, Vicenta

doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.019

Cited by 38 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other researchers have observed that women had higher satisfaction when they saw that their expectations about pain relief were met 1022 60 In the subscale ‘pain after delivery’, it was observed that women had less pain after delivery in the humanised model of maternity care than in the biomedical one, as well as less pain in the immediate postpartum period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo describe the differences in obstetrical results and women's childbirth satisfaction across 2 different models of maternity care (biomedical model and humanised birth).Setting2 university hospitals in south-eastern Spain from April to October 2013.DesignA correlational descriptive study.ParticipantsA convenience sample of 406 women participated in the study, 204 of the biomedical model and 202 of the humanised model.ResultsThe differences in obstetrical results were (biomedical model/humanised model): onset of labour (spontaneous 66/137, augmentation 70/1, p=0.0005), pain relief (epidural 172/132, no pain relief 9/40, p=0.0005), mode of delivery (normal vaginal 140/165, instrumental 48/23, p=0.004), length of labour (0–4 hours 69/93, >4 hours 133/108, p=0.011), condition of perineum (intact perineum or tear 94/178, episiotomy 100/24, p=0.0005). The total questionnaire score (100) gave a mean (M) of 78.33 and SD of 8.46 in the biomedical model of care and an M of 82.01 and SD of 7.97 in the humanised model of care (p=0.0005). In the analysis of the results per items, statistical differences were found in 8 of the 9 subscales. The highest scores were reached in the humanised model of maternity care.ConclusionsThe humanised model of maternity care offers better obstetrical outcomes and women's satisfaction scores during the labour, birth and immediate postnatal period than does the biomedical model.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, the Iranian version of the MCSRS can be a proper representative of functional service quality and the level of maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience at hospitals (1, 9, 12, 19, 20). In accordance with previous studies, mothers expected nurses and midwifes (as key maternity care providers) to be skilled, watchful, and compassionate towards them and their infants and to keep them away from hazards.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Iran: What Are the Psychometric Properties?

Moudi

Tavousi

2016

Nurs Midwifery Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundWith the integration of the evaluation of patient satisfaction in the overall assessment of healthcare services, authorities can be assured about the alignment of these services with patient needs and the suitability of care provided at the local level.ObjectivesThis study was conducted in 2013 in Zahedan, Iran, in order to assess the psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale (MCSRS).Patients and MethodsFor this study, a methodological design was used. After translating the MCSRS and confirming its initial validity, the questionnaires were distributed among women with uncomplicated pregnancies and no prior history of cesarean section. The participants had given birth to healthy, full-term, singletons (with cephalic presentation) via normal vaginal delivery at hospitals within the past six months. Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest (via the intraclass correlation coefficient) were applied to analyze the internal consistency and reliability of the scale. Moreover, the validity of the scale was tested via exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and convergent validity.ResultsThe MCSRS consists of six subscales. Through the process of validation, two partner-related items (“partner” subscale) of the scale were excluded due to cultural barriers and hospital policies. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.78. It ranged between 0.70 and 0.86 for five subscales, and was 0.31 for the “baby” subscale. Factor analysis confirmed the subscales of “nurse,” “physician,” and “baby,” which were identified in the original scale. However, in the translated version, the “self” subscale was divided into two separate dimensions. The six subscales explained 70.37% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fitness for the new model. Convergent validity showed a significant correlation between the MCSRS and the SERVQUAL scale (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). Moreover, the Farsi version of the MCSRS showed excellent repeatability (r = 0.81 - 0.96 for individual subscales and r = 0.96 for the entire scale).ConclusionsThe study findings indicated the Farsi version of the MCSRS is a reliable and valid instrument. However, according to the reliability assessment and factor analysis, the “baby” and “self” subscales need further revisions.

show abstract

“…Concerning women who speak Spanish, although work has been done in the field of maternal satisfaction, there are gaps in our knowledge especially with respect to women's satisfaction with preterm labor and birth. Only one validated questionnaire has been developed, the Spanish‐translated version of the P‐BESS .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Women's satisfaction with maternity care during preterm birth

Blázquez

Ferrándiz

Caballero

et al. 2019

Birth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Women's satisfaction with maternity care is strongly influenced by their sociodemographic characteristics, values, and attitudes. The arrival of a preterm baby is often a traumatic time, with unique factors involved. The Spanish Preterm Birth Experience and Satisfaction Scale (P-BESS) is a robust instrument capable of assessing women's satisfaction during preterm birth. The purpose of this study was to assess women's satisfaction with maternity care during labor and birth with preterm babies in a Spanish-speaking population. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Participants were 182 women who gave birth within 37 weeks' gestation. Factors associated with satisfaction were studied through univariate and bivariate analyses and through multiple linear regression using the backward elimination method. Results: Women reported high satisfaction with maternity care overall (average score of 84 out of 95). Women with a university education were generally less satisfied. Women were more satisfied if they were pregnant for the first time. Women who reported a previous premature birth or neonatal death were more satisfied, and women who had prior miscarriages were less satisfied compared with women without these experiences. Conclusions: The analysis confirmed that the majority of women surveyed were very satisfied with their childbirth experience. The Spanish P-BESS can be a useful way of prioritizing intervention measures, focusing on those aspects lowest scored by women, such as "information and explanations" and "confidence in staff," to improve maternity services for families experiencing preterm birth. K E Y W O R D Slabor, patient satisfaction, preterm births, surveys and questionnaires, validation studies Note: Four regression models were performed, one with the total score as the dependent variable and one for each of the subscales. The demographic variables that were significant with each of the scores, shown in Table 3, were included as independent variables, performing a method of selecting stepwise variables, which allows us to have models with only the significant variables. No significant factors were identified for the subscales Staff Professionalism and Empathy and Information and Explanations. T A B L E 4 Results of multivariateanalysis displaying association between the scale and factors associated with satisfaction, Spain, 2017

show abstract

Satisfacción de las mujeres con la experiencia del parto: validación de la Mackey Satisfaction Childbirth Rating Scale

Abstract: This scale is a useful instrument to measure women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth, adapted to our context and with good psychometric properties.

Cited by 38 publications

References 24 publications

Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care

Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care

Evaluation of Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Iran: What Are the Psychometric Properties?

Women's satisfaction with maternity care during preterm birth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About